Anonymous | Login
Project:
RSS
  
News | My View | View Issues | Roadmap | Summary

View Issue Details[ Jump to Notes ] [ Issue History ] [ Print ]
ID
0025142
TypeCategorySeverityReproducibilityDate SubmittedLast Update
defect[Openbravo ERP] 04. Warehouse managementmajoralways2013-11-13 11:302014-01-09 12:21
ReporterVictorVillarView Statuspublic 
Assigned ToAtulOpenbravo 
PriorityurgentResolutionno change requiredFixed in Version
StatusclosedFix in branchpiFixed in SCM revision
ProjectionnoneETAnoneTarget Version3.0PR14Q2
OSAnyDatabaseAnyJava version
OS VersionDatabase versionAnt version
Product VersionpiSCM revision 
Review Assigned ToVictorVillar
Web browser
ModulesCore
Regression level
Regression date
Regression introduced in release
Regression introduced by commit
Triggers an Emergency PackNo
Summary

0025142: Concurrent Execution flag should work in a different way for Costing Background process

DescriptionThe Costing Background process definiton should be different, it should be checked the 'Prevent Concurrent Executions' flag in order to avoid overlapping process (to configurate the background more than once for different organizations) and the cost calculation will be wrong
Steps To ReproduceCurrently it should not be any distinction regarding organization, because this process is executed for all the organizations in the client.
It should check if one Costing Background process is executing in that moment
TagsNo tags attached.
Attached Files

- Relationships [ Relation Graph ] [ Dependency Graph ]
depends on defect 00235483.0MP23 closeddmiguelez The Costing Background process definiton should be different 
depends on defect 0023561 closeddmiguelez When a Process is Defined as 'Prevent Concurrent Executions' allow to filter by Client and Organization for canceling one. 

-  Notes
(0063339)
VictorVillar (developer)
2014-01-09 12:21

 It is rejected, because since MP31 the process should be configured for each legal [1], because it will not be executed for all the client's organizations, it will be executed up to the organizations you have configured.

[1] https://issues.openbravo.com/view.php?id=25293 [^]

- Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
2013-11-13 11:30 VictorVillar New Issue
2013-11-13 11:30 VictorVillar Assigned To => dmiguelez
2013-11-13 11:30 VictorVillar Modules => Core
2013-11-13 11:30 VictorVillar Resolution time => 1387148400
2013-11-13 11:30 VictorVillar Triggers an Emergency Pack => No
2013-11-13 11:32 VictorVillar Relationship added depends on 0023548
2013-11-13 11:33 VictorVillar Relationship added depends on 0023561
2013-11-13 11:33 VictorVillar Issue Monitored: networkb
2013-11-13 11:37 VictorVillar Assigned To dmiguelez => jonalegriaesarte
2013-11-13 14:35 jonalegriaesarte Target Version 3.0MP30 => 3.0MP31
2013-12-23 13:50 jonalegriaesarte Assigned To jonalegriaesarte => pramakrishnan
2014-01-02 10:52 AtulOpenbravo Assigned To pramakrishnan => AtulOpenbravo
2014-01-02 10:52 AtulOpenbravo Status new => scheduled
2014-01-02 10:52 AtulOpenbravo fix_in_branch => pi
2014-01-02 12:38 jonalegriaesarte Target Version 3.0MP31 => 3.0MP32
2014-01-09 12:21 VictorVillar Review Assigned To => VictorVillar
2014-01-09 12:21 VictorVillar Note Added: 0063339
2014-01-09 12:21 VictorVillar Status scheduled => closed
2014-01-09 12:21 VictorVillar Resolution open => no change required

Copyright © 2000 - 2009 MantisBT Group
Powered by Mantis Bugtracker