Anonymous | Login
News | My View | View Issues | Roadmap | Summary

View Issue DetailsJump to Notes ] Issue History ] Print ]
TypeCategorySeverityReproducibilityDate SubmittedLast Update
defect[Openbravo ERP] B. User interfacemajoralways2012-04-25 17:482013-09-17 19:03
ReporteregoitzView Statuspublic 
Assigned Tomarvintm 
PriorityimmediateResolutionfixedFixed in Version3.0MP11
StatusclosedFix in branchFixed in SCM revision0a1670b979e2
ProjectionnoneETAnoneTarget Version3.0MP11
OSAnyDatabaseAnyJava version
OS VersionDatabase versionAnt version
Product Version3.0MP10.1SCM revision 
Review Assigned To
Web browser
Regression level
Regression date
Regression introduced in release
Regression introduced by commit
Triggers an Emergency PackNo

0020352: A selector doesn't work when writing on the field if exist a field with a displaylogic referencing to the field of the selector

DescriptionIf one of the fiels of a windows has a displaylogic depending on a field with selector reference, the selector does not work properly when writing on the field to find the element.
Steps To Reproduce-Define a tempalte as indevelopment
-Go as system administrator to windows, tabs and field window.
-find sales order window, header tab and go to a field, for example datepromissed
-Add a displaylogic depending on @C_BPartner_ID@
-Save and logout
-Login as Admin
-Go to sales order window
-write on the partner selector
*the value inserted is deleted automacitally
Attached Files

- Relationships Relation Graph ] Dependency Graph ]
related to defect 00197243.0MP9 closedmtaal See database id when stepping through records of different orgs 
related to defect 00247263.0MP28 closedshankarb Problems with Selectors if you migrate from Openbravo 2.22 

-  Notes
egoitz (developer)
2012-04-25 18:23

on mp7 it works.
on mp9 or higher doesn't
marvintm (developer)
2012-04-26 16:51

This regression was caused by the following changeset: [^]

Specifically, the part related to the ob-selector-item causes the problem: the presence of the business partner selector in the display logic generates a redraw, which in turn causes a call to the mapValueToDisplay method, which in its current form will delete the existing id, as it doesn't yet correspond to a valid business partner.

The change done to the ob-selector-item in the mentioned changeset will be reversed, as it is actually not needed to fix issue 19724.
hgbot (developer)
2012-04-26 17:30

Repository: erp/devel/pi
Changeset: 37ae4fda88808dc1f7f14d533cda143e256abf63
Author: Antonio Moreno <antonio.moreno <at>>
Date: Thu Apr 26 17:29:26 2012 +0200
URL: [^]

Fixed issue 20352. Do not remove an invalid value from the selector.
Reverted change done in changeset bcbda0ffe5d8. This change was causing the following behaviour to happen:
- When a field is used as part of a displaylogic of a different field, a redraw of the window will be done in case the selector value happens.
- This redraw will cause a call to the mapValueToDisplay method.
- If the user is typing the name of the business partner, the value will not be one of the valid business partner names (yet).
- With the previous version of the method, the value was then discarded. This produced the very annoying effect of reverting what the user had typed just after he had done it, if he hadn't been 'fast enough' to type the whole identifier of the business partner.
With the change done, the selector will not be cleared if a user types a (not yet completely correct) value in the selector, even if there is a valueMap which doesn't contain what the user has typed.
The issue which was supposedly fixed with this part of the mentioned changeset (issue 19724) still works fine as far as I can tell, even after having removed this part of the change.

M modules/org.openbravo.userinterface.selector/web/org.openbravo.userinterface.selector/js/ob-selector-item.js
hgbot (developer)
2012-04-26 18:40

Repository: erp/devel/pi
Changeset: 0a1670b979e2c0d42e97e8c8b045b4a760df9a28
Author: Antonio Moreno <antonio.moreno <at>>
Date: Thu Apr 26 18:37:11 2012 +0200
URL: [^]

Fixed issue 20352. Fixed also in case of combos. Provided a better solution which doesn't cancel previous fix.
- After the previous fix, we've realized that the same problem happened in the case of combos.
- Also, the previous fix reverted the fix of issue 19724, which could still be reproduceable in very specific circumstances.
Due to this, a new fix has been done. Instead of never removing the value if it didn't comply with any of the values in the map, we remove it if and only if the value is a UUID. This way, we avoid the problem in issue 19724 while still fixing the problem which happens when the user types a value.

M modules/org.openbravo.client.application/web/org.openbravo.client.application/js/form/formitem/ob-formitem-list.js
M modules/org.openbravo.client.application/web/org.openbravo.client.application/js/utilities/ob-utilities.js
M modules/org.openbravo.userinterface.selector/web/org.openbravo.userinterface.selector/js/ob-selector-item.js
marvintm (developer)
2012-04-26 18:41

The initial fix only worked for selectors, but the problem also happens in combos.

I've committed a second fix, which fixes the problem also for combos, and which fixes it in a different way, so that issue 19724 doesn't happen again.

The second fix basically consists on removing the value if it doesn't fit any of the values in the map, but only if this value is UUID, and preserving it otherwise.
egoitz (developer)
2012-04-27 10:05

AugustoMauch (manager)
2012-04-27 11:03

Code reviewed and verified in pi@1a9ed7b323c5
hudsonbot (developer)
2012-04-28 02:31

A changeset related to this issue has been promoted main and to the
Central Repository, after passing a series of tests.

Promotion changeset: [^]

Maturity status: Test
hgbot (developer)
2013-09-11 20:22

Repository: erp/devel/pi
Changeset: dd0f6674c85196f95c3ddfe97a527b764fd6df99
Author: Shankar Balachandran <shankar.balachandran <at>>
Date: Wed Sep 11 23:50:28 2013 +0530
URL: [^]

Fixes Issue 0024726: Problems with Selectors if you migrate from Openbravo 2.22

In the fix for the issue 20352 [1], the condition to replace the numbers only if its a 32 characters UUID was introduced.
But there are ID's in the system that is upto 10 characters, but all numbers. So it does not replace the numbers for these cases,
so instead of the text, the ID's were shown. Now added condition to check the following:
1. uuid's length should be less than 10 or equal to 32.
2. If uuid's length is less than 10, it should contain only numeric values

[1] [^]

M modules/org.openbravo.client.application/web/org.openbravo.client.application/js/utilities/ob-utilities.js
hudsonbot (developer)
2013-09-17 19:03

A changeset related to this issue has been promoted main and to the
Central Repository, after passing a series of tests.

Promotion changeset: [^]

Maturity status: Test

- Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
2012-04-25 17:48 egoitz New Issue
2012-04-25 17:48 egoitz Assigned To => dbaz
2012-04-25 17:48 egoitz Modules => Core
2012-04-25 17:48 egoitz Resolution time => 1335736800
2012-04-25 17:48 egoitz Tag Attached: Regression
2012-04-25 17:49 egoitz version 3.0MP9 => 3.0MP10.1
2012-04-25 17:49 egoitz Target Version => 3.0MP11
2012-04-25 17:51 dbaz Assigned To dbaz => marvintm
2012-04-25 18:23 egoitz Note Added: 0047974
2012-04-25 18:25 egoitz Issue Monitored: networkb
2012-04-26 09:35 shuehner Issue Monitored: shuehner
2012-04-26 16:51 marvintm Note Added: 0048047
2012-04-26 17:10 marvintm Relationship added related to 0019724
2012-04-26 17:30 hgbot Checkin
2012-04-26 17:30 hgbot Note Added: 0048057
2012-04-26 17:30 hgbot Status new => resolved
2012-04-26 17:30 hgbot Resolution open => fixed
2012-04-26 17:30 hgbot Fixed in SCM revision => [^]
2012-04-26 18:40 hgbot Checkin
2012-04-26 18:40 hgbot Note Added: 0048064
2012-04-26 18:40 hgbot Fixed in SCM revision [^] => [^]
2012-04-26 18:41 marvintm Note Added: 0048065
2012-04-27 10:05 egoitz Note Added: 0048129
2012-04-27 10:05 egoitz Status resolved => closed
2012-04-27 10:05 egoitz Fixed in Version => 3.0MP11
2012-04-27 11:03 AugustoMauch Note Added: 0048134
2012-04-28 02:31 hudsonbot Checkin
2012-04-28 02:31 hudsonbot Note Added: 0048164
2013-09-11 10:35 alostale Relationship added related to 0024726
2013-09-11 20:22 hgbot Checkin
2013-09-11 20:22 hgbot Note Added: 0061086
2013-09-17 19:03 hudsonbot Checkin
2013-09-17 19:03 hudsonbot Note Added: 0061239

Copyright © 2000 - 2009 MantisBT Group
Powered by Mantis Bugtracker