Anonymous | Login
Project:
RSS
  
News | My View | View Issues | Roadmap | Summary

View Issue Details[ Jump to Notes ] [ Issue History ] [ Print ]
ID
0014382
TypeCategorySeverityReproducibilityDate SubmittedLast Update
defect[Openbravo ERP] 07. Sales managementmajoralways2010-08-30 20:112010-09-21 00:00
ReporternetworkbView Statuspublic 
Assigned Toadrianromero 
PriorityhighResolutionfixedFixed in Version
StatusclosedFix in branchpiFixed in SCM revision71cf3dcc3b33
ProjectionnoneETAnoneTarget Version2.50MP22
OSAnyDatabasePostgreSQLJava version
OS VersionDatabase versionAnt version
Product Version2.50MP20SCM revision 
Merge Request Status
Review Assigned To
OBNetwork customerOBPS
Web browser
ModulesCore
Support ticket
Regression level
Regression date
Regression introduced in release
Regression introduced by commit
Triggers an Emergency PackNo
Summary

0014382: The filters 'all selected' and 'not selected' are too confusing

DescriptionIn some screens there are filters with the values 'all selected' and 'not selected'

This is always causing confusion to people, as well as in training as well as now in the support queue where we someone reporting a problem about.

The problem is the 'all selected' means 'you have to select some values and only those values will be included'. However, people read 'all selected' as that all values will be included.
The value 'not selected' means that you won't filter and that all values will be included, but again, people do not read it this way.
Steps To ReproduceThis is applicable to the following screens:

Sales Management || Setup || External Point of Sales || External Point of Sales
See the fields 'included product' and 'included product categories'

Master Data Management || Pricing || Price Adjustments || Adjustments
See the fields 'included BP categories', 'included Business Partners', 'included product categories', 'included products', 'include pricelists'
Proposed Solutionsuggestion to change the labels of the values
'all selected' could be 'selected values'
'not selected' could be 'all values'
but I'm sure that Rob Goris can comment about the best solution for this
TagsNo tags attached.
Attached Files

- Relationships [ Relation Graph ] [ Dependency Graph ]

-  Notes
(0030484)
RenateNieuwkoop (viewer)
2010-08-30 20:25

 In Spanish the values are labelled:

Todos los seleccionados
Los no seleccionados

Which is equally confusing
(0030923)
dmitry_mezentsev (viewer)
2010-09-10 09:19

 My proposal is

'all selected' could be 'Only selected'
'not selected' could be 'All' (while I would check just in case that it does not work like 'All excluding selected'.
(0030993)
rgoris (viewer)
2010-09-13 15:07

 I´d go along the lines of Dmitry´s proposal but I do not like the term "selected" as the user has not selected anything. In fact, it is about all child records that were created/defined.

So:

'all selected' becomes 'Only those defined' (I´d almost add "below" to make people understand the definition takes place in the child records, anything against this?)
'not selected' becomes 'All'

(while I would check just in case that it does not work like 'All excluding defined'.
(0031047)
hgbot (developer)
2010-09-14 16:44

 Repository: erp/devel/pi
Changeset: dc6c5efef83b9b2cdd8fae14904f52b298471656
Author: Adrián Romero <adrianromero <at> openbravo.com>
Date: Tue Sep 14 16:43:30 2010 +0200
URL: http://code.openbravo.com/erp/devel/pi/rev/dc6c5efef83b9b2cdd8fae14904f52b298471656 [^]

Fixes issue 0014382: The filters 'all selected' and 'not selected' are too confusing
It has been modified the literals as agreed by *All* and *Only those defined*

---
M src-db/database/sourcedata/AD_REF_LIST.xml
---
(0031048)
adrianromero (viewer)
2010-09-14 16:47

 * Testing the issue

Go for example to Master Data Management || Pricing || Price Adjustments || Adjustments and verify that the possible values for fields Included BP Categories, Included Product Categories etc are All and Only those defined as agreed

* Other areas affected

It has only been modified the names of the possible values for the reference list "Offers" no other area affected.
(0031076)
rgoris (viewer)
2010-09-15 11:59

 As discussed over email:
Final solution must be:
[Only those defined]
[All excluding defined]
(0031085)
hgbot (developer)
2010-09-15 15:38

 Repository: erp/devel/pi
Changeset: 71cf3dcc3b335135544ac920b5ea14bbf80b1e6d
Author: Adrián Romero <adrianromero <at> openbravo.com>
Date: Wed Sep 15 15:38:15 2010 +0200
URL: http://code.openbravo.com/erp/devel/pi/rev/71cf3dcc3b335135544ac920b5ea14bbf80b1e6d [^]

Fixes issue 0014382: The filters 'all selected' and 'not selected' are too confusing
As agreed in the last discussion, the literals are *Only those defined* and *All excluding defined*

---
M src-db/database/sourcedata/AD_REF_LIST.xml
---
(0031119)
hudsonbot (viewer)
2010-09-15 20:55

 A changeset related to this issue has been promoted to main after passing a series of tests and an OBX has been generated:

Changeset: http://code.openbravo.com/erp/devel/main/rev/dc6c5efef83b [^]
Merge Changeset: http://code.openbravo.com/erp/devel/main/rev/80bfed94a6e8 [^]
Tests: http://builds.openbravo.com/view/int/ [^]
OBX: http://builds.openbravo.com/erp/core/obx/OpenbravoERP-2.50CI.18410.obx [^]
(0031132)
hudsonbot (viewer)
2010-09-15 20:55

 A changeset related to this issue has been promoted to main after passing a series of tests and an OBX has been generated:

Changeset: http://code.openbravo.com/erp/devel/main/rev/71cf3dcc3b33 [^]
Merge Changeset: http://code.openbravo.com/erp/devel/main/rev/80bfed94a6e8 [^]
Tests: http://builds.openbravo.com/view/int/ [^]
OBX: http://builds.openbravo.com/erp/core/obx/OpenbravoERP-2.50CI.18410.obx [^]
(0031208)
sureshbabu (viewer)
2010-09-20 08:53

 Now its changed to
 Only those defined
All excluding defined

- Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
2010-08-30 20:11 RenateNieuwkoop New Issue
2010-08-30 20:11 RenateNieuwkoop Assigned To => adrianromero
2010-08-30 20:11 RenateNieuwkoop OBNetwork customer => Yes
2010-08-30 20:12 RenateNieuwkoop Reporter RenateNieuwkoop => networkb
2010-08-30 20:25 RenateNieuwkoop Note Added: 0030484
2010-09-09 09:34 jonalegriaesarte Target Version => 2.50MP22
2010-09-09 11:56 adrianromero Status new => scheduled
2010-09-09 11:56 adrianromero fix_in_branch => pi
2010-09-10 09:19 dmitry_mezentsev Note Added: 0030923
2010-09-13 15:07 rgoris Note Added: 0030993
2010-09-14 16:44 hgbot Checkin
2010-09-14 16:44 hgbot Note Added: 0031047
2010-09-14 16:44 hgbot Status scheduled => resolved
2010-09-14 16:44 hgbot Resolution open => fixed
2010-09-14 16:44 hgbot Fixed in SCM revision => http://code.openbravo.com/erp/devel/pi/rev/dc6c5efef83b9b2cdd8fae14904f52b298471656 [^]
2010-09-14 16:47 adrianromero Note Added: 0031048
2010-09-15 11:59 rgoris Note Added: 0031076
2010-09-15 15:38 hgbot Checkin
2010-09-15 15:38 hgbot Note Added: 0031085
2010-09-15 15:38 hgbot Fixed in SCM revision http://code.openbravo.com/erp/devel/pi/rev/dc6c5efef83b9b2cdd8fae14904f52b298471656 [^] => http://code.openbravo.com/erp/devel/pi/rev/71cf3dcc3b335135544ac920b5ea14bbf80b1e6d [^]
2010-09-15 20:55 hudsonbot Checkin
2010-09-15 20:55 hudsonbot Note Added: 0031119
2010-09-15 20:55 hudsonbot Checkin
2010-09-15 20:55 hudsonbot Note Added: 0031132
2010-09-20 08:53 sureshbabu Note Added: 0031208
2010-09-20 08:53 sureshbabu Status resolved => closed
2010-09-21 00:00 anonymous sf_bug_id 0 => 3072191

Copyright © 2000 - 2009 MantisBT Group
Powered by Mantis Bugtracker