Openbravo Issue Tracking System - Openbravo ERP |
View Issue Details |
|
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
0014382 | Openbravo ERP | 07. Sales management | public | 2010-08-30 20:11 | 2010-09-21 00:00 |
|
Reporter | networkb | |
Assigned To | adrianromero | |
Priority | high | Severity | major | Reproducibility | always |
Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | |
Platform | | OS | 5 | OS Version | |
Product Version | 2.50MP20 | |
Target Version | 2.50MP22 | Fixed in Version | | |
Merge Request Status | |
Review Assigned To | |
OBNetwork customer | OBPS |
Web browser | |
Modules | Core |
Support ticket | |
Regression level | |
Regression date | |
Regression introduced in release | |
Regression introduced by commit | |
Triggers an Emergency Pack | No |
|
Summary | 0014382: The filters 'all selected' and 'not selected' are too confusing |
Description | In some screens there are filters with the values 'all selected' and 'not selected'
This is always causing confusion to people, as well as in training as well as now in the support queue where we someone reporting a problem about.
The problem is the 'all selected' means 'you have to select some values and only those values will be included'. However, people read 'all selected' as that all values will be included.
The value 'not selected' means that you won't filter and that all values will be included, but again, people do not read it this way. |
Steps To Reproduce | This is applicable to the following screens:
Sales Management || Setup || External Point of Sales || External Point of Sales
See the fields 'included product' and 'included product categories'
Master Data Management || Pricing || Price Adjustments || Adjustments
See the fields 'included BP categories', 'included Business Partners', 'included product categories', 'included products', 'include pricelists' |
Proposed Solution | suggestion to change the labels of the values
'all selected' could be 'selected values'
'not selected' could be 'all values'
but I'm sure that Rob Goris can comment about the best solution for this |
Additional Information | |
Tags | No tags attached. |
Relationships | |
Attached Files | |
|
Issue History |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
2010-08-30 20:11 | RenateNieuwkoop | New Issue | |
2010-08-30 20:11 | RenateNieuwkoop | Assigned To | => adrianromero |
2010-08-30 20:11 | RenateNieuwkoop | OBNetwork customer | => Yes |
2010-08-30 20:12 | RenateNieuwkoop | Reporter | RenateNieuwkoop => networkb |
2010-08-30 20:25 | RenateNieuwkoop | Note Added: 0030484 | |
2010-09-09 09:34 | jonalegriaesarte | Target Version | => 2.50MP22 |
2010-09-09 11:56 | adrianromero | Status | new => scheduled |
2010-09-09 11:56 | adrianromero | fix_in_branch | => pi |
2010-09-10 09:19 | dmitry_mezentsev | Note Added: 0030923 | |
2010-09-13 15:07 | rgoris | Note Added: 0030993 | |
2010-09-14 16:44 | hgbot | Checkin | |
2010-09-14 16:44 | hgbot | Note Added: 0031047 | |
2010-09-14 16:44 | hgbot | Status | scheduled => resolved |
2010-09-14 16:44 | hgbot | Resolution | open => fixed |
2010-09-14 16:44 | hgbot | Fixed in SCM revision | => http://code.openbravo.com/erp/devel/pi/rev/dc6c5efef83b9b2cdd8fae14904f52b298471656 [^] |
2010-09-14 16:47 | adrianromero | Note Added: 0031048 | |
2010-09-15 11:59 | rgoris | Note Added: 0031076 | |
2010-09-15 15:38 | hgbot | Checkin | |
2010-09-15 15:38 | hgbot | Note Added: 0031085 | |
2010-09-15 15:38 | hgbot | Fixed in SCM revision | http://code.openbravo.com/erp/devel/pi/rev/dc6c5efef83b9b2cdd8fae14904f52b298471656 [^] => http://code.openbravo.com/erp/devel/pi/rev/71cf3dcc3b335135544ac920b5ea14bbf80b1e6d [^] |
2010-09-15 20:55 | hudsonbot | Checkin | |
2010-09-15 20:55 | hudsonbot | Note Added: 0031119 | |
2010-09-15 20:55 | hudsonbot | Checkin | |
2010-09-15 20:55 | hudsonbot | Note Added: 0031132 | |
2010-09-20 08:53 | sureshbabu | Note Added: 0031208 | |
2010-09-20 08:53 | sureshbabu | Status | resolved => closed |
2010-09-21 00:00 | anonymous | sf_bug_id | 0 => 3072191 |
Notes |
|
(0030484)
|
RenateNieuwkoop
|
2010-08-30 20:25
|
|
In Spanish the values are labelled:
Todos los seleccionados
Los no seleccionados
Which is equally confusing |
|
|
|
My proposal is
'all selected' could be 'Only selected'
'not selected' could be 'All' (while I would check just in case that it does not work like 'All excluding selected'. |
|
|
(0030993)
|
rgoris
|
2010-09-13 15:07
|
|
I´d go along the lines of Dmitry´s proposal but I do not like the term "selected" as the user has not selected anything. In fact, it is about all child records that were created/defined.
So:
'all selected' becomes 'Only those defined' (I´d almost add "below" to make people understand the definition takes place in the child records, anything against this?)
'not selected' becomes 'All'
(while I would check just in case that it does not work like 'All excluding defined'. |
|
|
(0031047)
|
hgbot
|
2010-09-14 16:44
|
|
Repository: erp/devel/pi
Changeset: dc6c5efef83b9b2cdd8fae14904f52b298471656
Author: Adrián Romero <adrianromero <at> openbravo.com>
Date: Tue Sep 14 16:43:30 2010 +0200
URL: http://code.openbravo.com/erp/devel/pi/rev/dc6c5efef83b9b2cdd8fae14904f52b298471656 [^]
Fixes issue 0014382: The filters 'all selected' and 'not selected' are too confusing
It has been modified the literals as agreed by *All* and *Only those defined*
---
M src-db/database/sourcedata/AD_REF_LIST.xml
---
|
|
|
|
* Testing the issue
Go for example to Master Data Management || Pricing || Price Adjustments || Adjustments and verify that the possible values for fields Included BP Categories, Included Product Categories etc are All and Only those defined as agreed
* Other areas affected
It has only been modified the names of the possible values for the reference list "Offers" no other area affected. |
|
|
(0031076)
|
rgoris
|
2010-09-15 11:59
|
|
As discussed over email:
Final solution must be:
[Only those defined]
[All excluding defined] |
|
|
(0031085)
|
hgbot
|
2010-09-15 15:38
|
|
Repository: erp/devel/pi
Changeset: 71cf3dcc3b335135544ac920b5ea14bbf80b1e6d
Author: Adrián Romero <adrianromero <at> openbravo.com>
Date: Wed Sep 15 15:38:15 2010 +0200
URL: http://code.openbravo.com/erp/devel/pi/rev/71cf3dcc3b335135544ac920b5ea14bbf80b1e6d [^]
Fixes issue 0014382: The filters 'all selected' and 'not selected' are too confusing
As agreed in the last discussion, the literals are *Only those defined* and *All excluding defined*
---
M src-db/database/sourcedata/AD_REF_LIST.xml
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now its changed to
Only those defined
All excluding defined |
|