0012266: Amortization link in Asset Amortization is not correct

(0024282)
dalsasua (viewer)
2010-02-15 17:12

In http://live.builds.openbravo.com/erp_devel_pi-full-oracle/security/Menu.html [^] it's working fine.

(0024283)
networkb (viewer)
2010-02-15 17:23

Link works properly. But it makes no sense this link.

It should be replaced by other one to Amortization line

(0024284)
dalsasua (viewer)
2010-02-15 17:29

There is a link to the amortization header, that works fine. Another link can be added to amortization line, if you want. Please report the feature request to do this if you want.

(0024370)
psarobe (viewer)
2010-02-15 19:11

Hi David,

Since that link is not useful from a end user perspective this is an issue. What is true is that maybe it's not that easy

We have to think which is the best way

(0025566)
dmitry_mezentsev (viewer)
2010-03-17 11:45

Hi Guys,

Was surfing through OBPS issues and mentioned this one.

Could you please explain the benefit of having a link to the Amortization line from Asset Amortization tab and removing the previous one?

I mean if to look at the information displayed at these tabs there is practically no different so why then to have this link?

The only difference is that Amortization line shows Asset name while Amortization tab does not. Maybe it is just better to add Asset name to the Amortization tab and that is all?

And in that sense the link to Amortization header is OK for me course allows user to navigate from the particular asset amortization to the period in which it is going to be accounted, for example to process it.

What do you think?

(0025567)
psarobe (viewer)
2010-03-17 11:59

Yes Dmitry, I didn't go to any of those two tabs. But it's clear that you are right. There is no difference at all between those two tabs so I don't see any reason of why the end user would like to browse to a tab which is exactly the same. What it makes sense is how it is right now that you navigate to the amortization. When I talked to NPE I though that the benefit of moving directly to that tab was clear but now it makes no sense to invest time on this.

NPE: Any comments on this?

(0025568)
networkb (viewer)
2010-03-17 12:06

If Accounting line shows information about amortization line, makes sense to navigate to this tab, and not to header.
It is easier for the end user to navigate to line, and if it is needed to header, than navigate directly to header, and then search the line for an specific asset.

If a tab is showing information a line, it makes sense to add a link to line, not to header.

If any help or comment is needed, please contact me

(0025572)
dmitry_mezentsev (viewer)
2010-03-17 13:31

Sorry but I cannot agree with this approach. I think that if we to add some linked information there should be a reason to use it for the customer (as a part of some business process or sth), but in our case there is nothing so we will just add more complexity but without any value.

I vote for adding Asset name to Amortization tab (to add better visibility in terms of "parent - child") and that is all.

(0025574)
psarobe (viewer)
2010-03-17 13:44

Thanks for the info

Issue History
Date Modified	Username	Field	Change
2010-02-15 10:28	networkb	New Issue
2010-02-15 10:28	networkb	Assigned To	=> dalsasua
2010-02-15 10:28	networkb	OBNetwork customer	=> Yes
2010-02-15 17:12	dalsasua	Note Added: 0024282
2010-02-15 17:12	dalsasua	Status	new => closed
2010-02-15 17:12	dalsasua	Resolution	open => unable to reproduce
2010-02-15 17:23	networkb	Note Added: 0024283
2010-02-15 17:29	dalsasua	Note Added: 0024284
2010-02-15 19:11	psarobe	Note Added: 0024370
2010-02-15 19:11	psarobe	Status	closed => new
2010-02-15 19:11	psarobe	Resolution	unable to reproduce => open
2010-02-15 19:12	psarobe	Assigned To	dalsasua => adrianromero
2010-02-15 19:12	psarobe	Status	new => scheduled
2010-02-15 19:12	psarobe	fix_in_branch	=> pi
2010-03-08 16:05	jpabloae	Target Version	2.50MP14 => 2.50MP15
2010-03-17 11:45	dmitry_mezentsev	Note Added: 0025566
2010-03-17 11:59	psarobe	Note Added: 0025567
2010-03-17 12:06	networkb	Note Added: 0025568
2010-03-17 13:31	dmitry_mezentsev	Note Added: 0025572
2010-03-17 13:44	psarobe	Note Added: 0025574
2010-03-17 13:44	psarobe	Status	scheduled => closed
2010-03-17 13:44	psarobe	Resolution	open => no change required
2010-03-18 00:00	anonymous	sf_bug_id	0 => 2972288
2010-05-18 12:12	gorka_gil	Target Version	2.50MP15 => 2.50MP17

Notes
(0024282) dalsasua (viewer) 2010-02-15 17:12	In http://live.builds.openbravo.com/erp_devel_pi-full-oracle/security/Menu.html [^] it's working fine.

(0024283) networkb (viewer) 2010-02-15 17:23	Link works properly. But it makes no sense this link. It should be replaced by other one to Amortization line

(0024284) dalsasua (viewer) 2010-02-15 17:29	There is a link to the amortization header, that works fine. Another link can be added to amortization line, if you want. Please report the feature request to do this if you want.

(0024370) psarobe (viewer) 2010-02-15 19:11	Hi David, Since that link is not useful from a end user perspective this is an issue. What is true is that maybe it's not that easy We have to think which is the best way

(0025566) dmitry_mezentsev (viewer) 2010-03-17 11:45	Hi Guys, Was surfing through OBPS issues and mentioned this one. Could you please explain the benefit of having a link to the Amortization line from Asset Amortization tab and removing the previous one? I mean if to look at the information displayed at these tabs there is practically no different so why then to have this link? The only difference is that Amortization line shows Asset name while Amortization tab does not. Maybe it is just better to add Asset name to the Amortization tab and that is all? And in that sense the link to Amortization header is OK for me course allows user to navigate from the particular asset amortization to the period in which it is going to be accounted, for example to process it. What do you think?

(0025567) psarobe (viewer) 2010-03-17 11:59	Yes Dmitry, I didn't go to any of those two tabs. But it's clear that you are right. There is no difference at all between those two tabs so I don't see any reason of why the end user would like to browse to a tab which is exactly the same. What it makes sense is how it is right now that you navigate to the amortization. When I talked to NPE I though that the benefit of moving directly to that tab was clear but now it makes no sense to invest time on this. NPE: Any comments on this?

(0025568) networkb (viewer) 2010-03-17 12:06	If Accounting line shows information about amortization line, makes sense to navigate to this tab, and not to header. It is easier for the end user to navigate to line, and if it is needed to header, than navigate directly to header, and then search the line for an specific asset. If a tab is showing information a line, it makes sense to add a link to line, not to header. If any help or comment is needed, please contact me

(0025572) dmitry_mezentsev (viewer) 2010-03-17 13:31	Sorry but I cannot agree with this approach. I think that if we to add some linked information there should be a reason to use it for the customer (as a part of some business process or sth), but in our case there is nothing so we will just add more complexity but without any value. I vote for adding Asset name to Amortization tab (to add better visibility in terms of "parent - child") and that is all.

(0025574) psarobe (viewer) 2010-03-17 13:44	Thanks for the info

Relationships [ Relation Graph ] [ Dependency Graph ]