Anonymous | Login
Project:
RSS
  
News | My View | View Issues | Roadmap | Summary

View Issue DetailsJump to Notes ] Issue History ] Print ]
ID
0008993
TypeCategorySeverityReproducibilityDate SubmittedLast Update
defect[Openbravo ERP] 00. Application dictionarymajorhave not tried2009-05-11 18:262009-05-30 00:00
ReportergalderromoView Statuspublic 
Assigned Torafaroda 
PrioritynormalResolutionunable to reproduceFixed in Version
StatusclosedFix in branchFixed in SCM revision
ProjectionnoneETAnoneTarget Version
OSLinux 32 bitDatabaseOracleJava version1.5.0_15
OS VersionGentoo 2.6.24Database versionXEAnt version1.7
Product VersionmainSCM revision0ab81537e7d3 
Merge Request Status
Review Assigned To
OBNetwork customerNo
Web browser
ModulesCore
Support ticket
Regression level
Regression date
Regression introduced in release
Regression introduced by commit
Triggers an Emergency PackNo
Summary

0008993: ad_process window, class tab, action field

DescriptionDoes not take 'P' as default value. As the table has a WHERE clause only shows records with action='P'. This way, we user can introduce once and again many clases and later on web.xml gives problems.
Steps To Reproducecreate a process and save
create a class for the process and save
it does not appear on the window
Proposed Solutionintroduce a default value for 'action' field
TagsNo tags attached.
Attached Files

- Relationships Relation Graph ] Dependency Graph ]
related to defect 0004549 closedrafaroda Process class tab should have a default be not editable and have a fixed value for the action 

-  Notes
(0016467)
psarobe (viewer)
2009-05-19 16:41

Hi Galder,

I click new in process and has the default value "Process". Apart from that the combo box is not editable so always has the value "Process"

I guess that is the correct behavior, right?
(0016468)
galderromo (viewer)
2009-05-19 16:44

Right, that is the correct behaviour.
I do not understand why it didn't work to me.
(0016513)
psarobe (viewer)
2009-05-20 12:48

Are you using 250?
(0016520)
galderromo (viewer)
2009-05-20 13:14

Yes.
SCM revision 0ab81537e7d3
(0016553)
rafaroda (viewer)
2009-05-21 11:04

Galder,

Does this still reproduce?

Thanks.

- Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
2009-05-11 18:26 galderromo New Issue
2009-05-11 18:26 galderromo Assigned To => rafaroda
2009-05-11 18:26 galderromo OBNetwork customer => No
2009-05-11 18:26 galderromo Regression testing => No
2009-05-19 16:41 psarobe Note Added: 0016467
2009-05-19 16:41 psarobe Status new => feedback
2009-05-19 16:44 galderromo Note Added: 0016468
2009-05-20 10:13 rafaroda Relationship added related to 0004549
2009-05-20 12:48 psarobe Note Added: 0016513
2009-05-20 13:14 galderromo Note Added: 0016520
2009-05-21 11:04 rafaroda Note Added: 0016553
2009-05-29 09:35 psarobe Status feedback => closed
2009-05-29 09:35 psarobe Resolution open => unable to reproduce
2009-05-30 00:00 anonymous sf_bug_id 0 => 2798621


Copyright © 2000 - 2009 MantisBT Group
Powered by Mantis Bugtracker