Project:
| View Issue Details[ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||||
| ID | |||||||||||
| 0007902 | |||||||||||
| Type | Category | Severity | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||||
| design defect | [Openbravo ERP] Z. Others | minor | have not tried | 2009-03-02 18:13 | 2012-05-10 12:12 | ||||||
| Reporter | shuehner | View Status | public | ||||||||
| Assigned To | mirurita | ||||||||||
| Priority | low | Resolution | open | Fixed in Version | |||||||
| Status | acknowledged | Fix in branch | Fixed in SCM revision | ||||||||
| Projection | none | ETA | none | Target Version | |||||||
| OS | Any | Database | Any | Java version | |||||||
| OS Version | Database version | Ant version | |||||||||
| Product Version | 2.40 | SCM revision | |||||||||
| Review Assigned To | |||||||||||
| Web browser | |||||||||||
| Modules | Core | ||||||||||
| Regression level | |||||||||||
| Regression date | |||||||||||
| Regression introduced in release | |||||||||||
| Regression introduced by commit | |||||||||||
| Triggers an Emergency Pack | No | ||||||||||
| Summary | 0007902: Check that isactive is used when it exists in a table | ||||||||||
| Description | If a table has a column isactive, then this column should be properly used so that processes do not use inactive entries of the table. It should be verified that this is the case for all tables having a isactive column. | ||||||||||
| Proposed Solution | Either: - remove the isactive column from a table - all functionality should honor value of the isactive | ||||||||||
| Tags | Clean-up | ||||||||||
| Attached Files | |||||||||||
 Relationships [ Relation Graph ]
[ Dependency Graph ]
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
 Relationships |
|
Notes |
|
|
(0014238) shuehner (administrator) 2009-03-02 18:13 |
Adding this as general request for audit, after finding at least one case where it is not handled properly (7901). |
|
(0014292) joan (reporter) 2009-03-03 12:24 |
Pending production Report seams to dont check the is active Process Plan Print neither I think most of the reports doesn't take into consideration the isactive check We should check also the processes. |
|
(0014336) pjuvara (reporter) 2009-03-03 19:16 |
This is not a feature request but a defect. |
|
(0045367) alostale (manager) 2012-02-22 15:47 |
Setting as design defect as this review affects the design of all processes. |
|
Notes |
|
Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 2009-03-02 18:13 | shuehner | New Issue | |
| 2009-03-02 18:13 | shuehner | Assigned To | => rafaroda |
| 2009-03-02 18:13 | shuehner | Regression testing | => No |
| 2009-03-02 18:13 | shuehner | Relationship added | related to 0007901 |
| 2009-03-02 18:13 | shuehner | Note Added: 0014238 | |
| 2009-03-03 12:24 | joan | Note Added: 0014292 | |
| 2009-03-03 12:25 | rafaroda | Assigned To | rafaroda => pjuvara |
| 2009-03-03 19:16 | pjuvara | Note Added: 0014336 | |
| 2009-03-03 19:16 | pjuvara | Assigned To | pjuvara => rafaroda |
| 2009-03-03 19:16 | pjuvara | Type | feature request => defect |
| 2009-03-03 19:45 | pjuvara | version | => 2.40 |
| 2009-03-04 08:43 | rafaroda | Tag Attached: Clean-up | |
| 2009-03-04 08:44 | rafaroda | Assigned To | rafaroda => shuehner |
| 2009-03-04 08:44 | rafaroda | Priority | normal => low |
| 2009-03-04 08:44 | rafaroda | Status | new => acknowledged |
| 2012-02-20 11:40 | shuehner | Assigned To | shuehner => alostale |
| 2012-02-22 15:47 | alostale | Note Added: 0045367 | |
| 2012-02-22 15:47 | alostale | Assigned To | alostale => vmromanos |
| 2012-02-22 15:47 | alostale | Type | defect => design defect |
| 2012-05-10 12:12 | gorka_gil | Assigned To | vmromanos => mirurita |
|
Issue History |
| Copyright © 2000 - 2009 MantisBT Group |
 |