Openbravo Issue Tracking System - Openbravo ERP |
| View Issue Details |
|
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
| 0007902 | Openbravo ERP | Z. Others | public | 2009-03-02 18:13 | 2012-05-10 12:12 |
|
| Reporter | shuehner | |
| Assigned To | mirurita | |
| Priority | low | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried |
| Status | acknowledged | Resolution | open | |
| Platform | | OS | 5 | OS Version | |
| Product Version | 2.40 | |
| Target Version | | Fixed in Version | | |
| Merge Request Status | |
| Review Assigned To | |
| OBNetwork customer | |
| Web browser | |
| Modules | Core |
| Support ticket | |
| Regression level | |
| Regression date | |
| Regression introduced in release | |
| Regression introduced by commit | |
| Triggers an Emergency Pack | No |
|
| Summary | 0007902: Check that isactive is used when it exists in a table |
| Description | If a table has a column isactive, then this column should be properly used so that processes do not use inactive entries of the table.
It should be verified that this is the case for all tables having a isactive column. |
| Steps To Reproduce | |
| Proposed Solution | Either:
- remove the isactive column from a table
- all functionality should honor value of the isactive |
| Additional Information | |
| Tags | Clean-up |
| Relationships | | related to | defect | 0007901 | | closed | Sandrahuguet | isactive is ignored for table m_product_bom (Bill of Materials tab in Product window) |
|
| Attached Files | |
|
| Issue History |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 2009-03-02 18:13 | shuehner | New Issue | |
| 2009-03-02 18:13 | shuehner | Assigned To | => rafaroda |
| 2009-03-02 18:13 | shuehner | Regression testing | => No |
| 2009-03-02 18:13 | shuehner | Relationship added | related to 0007901 |
| 2009-03-02 18:13 | shuehner | Note Added: 0014238 | |
| 2009-03-03 12:24 | joan | Note Added: 0014292 | |
| 2009-03-03 12:25 | rafaroda | Assigned To | rafaroda => pjuvara |
| 2009-03-03 19:16 | pjuvara | Note Added: 0014336 | |
| 2009-03-03 19:16 | pjuvara | Assigned To | pjuvara => rafaroda |
| 2009-03-03 19:16 | pjuvara | Type | feature request => defect |
| 2009-03-03 19:45 | pjuvara | version | => 2.40 |
| 2009-03-04 08:43 | rafaroda | Tag Attached: Clean-up | |
| 2009-03-04 08:44 | rafaroda | Assigned To | rafaroda => shuehner |
| 2009-03-04 08:44 | rafaroda | Priority | normal => low |
| 2009-03-04 08:44 | rafaroda | Status | new => acknowledged |
| 2012-02-20 11:40 | shuehner | Assigned To | shuehner => alostale |
| 2012-02-22 15:47 | alostale | Note Added: 0045367 | |
| 2012-02-22 15:47 | alostale | Assigned To | alostale => vmromanos |
| 2012-02-22 15:47 | alostale | Type | defect => design defect |
| 2012-05-10 12:12 | gorka_gil | Assigned To | vmromanos => mirurita |
|
Notes |
|
|
|
|
Adding this as general request for audit, after finding at least one case where it is not handled properly (7901). |
|
|
|
(0014292)
|
|
joan
|
|
2009-03-03 12:24
|
|
Pending production Report seams to dont check the is active
Process Plan Print neither
I think most of the reports doesn't take into consideration the isactive check
We should check also the processes. |
|
|
|
|
|
This is not a feature request but a defect. |
|
|
|
|
|
Setting as design defect as this review affects the design of all processes. |
|