Anonymous | Login
Project:
RSS
  
News | My View | View Issues | Roadmap | Summary

View Issue DetailsJump to Notes ] Issue History ] Print ]
ID
0037998
TypeCategorySeverityReproducibilityDate SubmittedLast Update
feature request[Localization Pack: Spain] AEAT 347majoralways2018-02-23 12:582021-11-12 11:31
ReporterpsanjuanView Statuspublic 
Assigned Topsanjuan 
PrioritylowResolutionopenFixed in Version
StatusnewFix in branchFixed in SCM revision
ProjectionnoneETAnoneTarget Version
OSLinux 64 bitDatabasePostgreSQLJava version7.x
OS VersionOpenbravo Appliance 14.04Database version9.3.xAnt version1.9.x
Product VersionSCM revision 
Regression date
Regression introduced by commit
Regression level
Review Assigned To
Regression introduced in release
Summary

0037998: 347 form should be enhanced and check whether all tax lines included in an invoice are related to a 347 parameter.

Description347 form should be enhanced and check whether all tax lines included in an invoice are related to a 347 parameter.
Steps To ReproduceCreate a tax rate including both a VAT line and a withholding line.
VAT tax rate needs to be related to a 347 tax parameter.

Create a purchase invoice with that tax rate. Run 347 report and check that the invoice is included.

This is not correct because 347 should not include invoices that have a withholding tax rate.
Proposed Solution347 tax report needs to be extended to check whether all tax lines of an invoice are related to a 347 parameter, otherwise the invoice should not be included in 347.

TagsNo tags attached.
Attached Files? file icon AEAT347ReportAPRDao_issue37998.java [^] (40,478 bytes) 2018-02-23 12:58

- Relationships Relation Graph ] Dependency Graph ]

-  Notes
(0102825)
psanjuan (manager)
2018-02-23 12:58

This development has been already implemented for a real customer and its partner has provided us with the code.

To review the code and analize whether this proposed solution is correct for all potencial 347 scenarios needs to be done.
(0109528)
psanjuan (manager)
2019-02-04 12:33

A workaround for this would be to remove the 347 tax report parameter from the VAT tax rate.

This fix only applies in case that parameter is not remove by mistake.

- Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
2018-02-23 12:58 psanjuan New Issue
2018-02-23 12:58 psanjuan Assigned To => Triage Finance
2018-02-23 12:58 psanjuan Note Added: 0102825
2018-02-23 12:58 psanjuan File Added: AEAT347ReportAPRDao_issue37998.java
2018-02-23 12:58 psanjuan Assigned To Triage Finance => Opentix-Test
2019-02-04 12:33 psanjuan Note Added: 0109528
2021-02-01 10:17 psanjuan Assigned To Opentix-Test => psanjuan
2021-11-12 11:31 psanjuan Priority high => low


Copyright © 2000 - 2009 MantisBT Group
Powered by Mantis Bugtracker