Project:
| View Issue Details[ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | |||||||
| ID | ||||||||
| 0037592 | ||||||||
| Type | Category | Severity | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Last Update | |||
| defect | [Openbravo ERP] Y. DBSourceManager | critical | always | 2018-01-05 15:26 | 2018-03-02 16:52 | |||
| Reporter | neil_smith | View Status | public | |||||
| Assigned To | platform | |||||||
| Priority | immediate | Resolution | no change required | Fixed in Version | ||||
| Status | closed | Fix in branch | Fixed in SCM revision | |||||
| Projection | none | ETA | none | Target Version | ||||
| OS | Any | Database | PostgreSQL | Java version | 1.8.0_151 | |||
| OS Version | Database version | 9.3.13 | Ant version | |||||
| Product Version | 3.0PR17Q2.4 | SCM revision | ||||||
| Merge Request Status | ||||||||
| Review Assigned To | ||||||||
| OBNetwork customer | No | |||||||
| Web browser | ||||||||
| Modules | Core | |||||||
| Support ticket | ||||||||
| Regression level | ||||||||
| Regression date | ||||||||
| Regression introduced in release | ||||||||
| Regression introduced by commit | ||||||||
| Triggers an Emergency Pack | No | |||||||
| Summary | 0037592: update.database hangs if one module has a column in a table that's in another module not installed | |||||||
| Description | Hello, I just recently updated to 3.0MP17Q2.4 When I did the upgrade, everything went well (I went on a new instance and copied all the modules to the new instance). Now, when I try to install a module update, I get the error (log extract pased at the end). This is what I have Module A, B and C In some cases, I need module A, B and C. In some, only A and B. Module A and B create columns in module C (C is dependent on A and B, but not A and B on C). If I only have module A and B installed, I get the error. This did not happen in the previous version we had installed (3.0PR16Q1.3). I can't imagine having to create a module for each dependence between 2 modules... In my example, I would have to create 2 new modules, AC and BC... But that's not all, I also would have to change all the tables, windows, processes... Copy the data from the old column to the new one... Everything that uses those columns... And I have lot more than 3 modules... I'm really stuck, I can't update or do anything now... [java] 110490 INFO - Running modulescripts... [java] 110621 INFO - Executing moduleScript: org.openbravo.modulescript.HBFix [java] 110849 INFO - Executing moduleScript: org.openbravo.modulescript.InitializeCostingMigrationPreference [java] 110916 INFO - Executing moduleScript: org.openbravo.advpaymentmngt.modulescript.InitializeAPRMReadyPreference [java] 110959 INFO - Updating Application Dictionary data... [java] 116275 ERROR - Error while inserting into the database: ERROR: insert or update on table "ad_column" violates foreign key constraint "ad_table_column" [java] Détail : Key (ad_table_id)=(8A8A80F63422305B0134225A5624004C) is not present in table "ad_table". [java] org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: ERROR: insert or update on table "ad_column" violates foreign key constraint "ad_table_column" [java] Détail : Key (ad_table_id)=(8A8A80F63422305B0134225A5624004C) is not present in table "ad_table". | |||||||
| Steps To Reproduce | 1. Create 2 modules, A and B 2 In module A and B, create a table 3 In module A, create a column in the table in module B (EM_...) | |||||||
| Proposed Solution | Ignore column creation if table doesn't exist (as before) | |||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | |||||||
| Attached Files | ||||||||
 Relationships [ Relation Graph ]
[ Dependency Graph ]
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
 Relationships |
|
Notes |
|
|
(0101782) alostale (viewer) 2018-01-19 12:11 |
The problem is due to incorrect module definition. If module A and B use artifacts from C, they should depend on it and they cannot be installed without it. Before fix 0034061 references from A and B were removed but the state was somehow inconsistent (ie. what you had in DB was not what A and B defined). |
|
(0101802) neil_smith (viewer) 2018-01-19 14:52 |
Well it worked fine before... We developped things this way because it worked that way... I can't make A and B dependent on C, that would mean that we have to install module C everywhere, and that wouldn't be correct. How can I correct my modules? Do I have to create a module (AC) for these objects? But how do I call the columns in the table of module A that have to be added to the table in module C? EM_AC_COLUMN_NAME? Or can I simply call it C_COLUMN_NAME and define it as a table reference in the AD and set it's definition to point to the right table? To be honnest, none of these sound right to me... And if I have to change the column name, I'm going to loose all the data in that column, and that is not concievable... Is it not possible to make it work as before? Or at least for EM_ columns, if the destination table doesn't exist, don't create the column. We will have to refactor everything and that represents 100s of hours of updating the database, the sources, testing everything... Can you please help me with this, it has huge implications for us. Thanks for your time Best regards Neil |
|
(0102941) neil_smith (viewer) 2018-03-02 16:52 |
Thanks for your help... |
|
Notes |
|
Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 2018-01-05 15:26 | neil_smith | New Issue | |
| 2018-01-05 15:26 | neil_smith | Assigned To | => platform |
| 2018-01-05 15:26 | neil_smith | Modules | => Core |
| 2018-01-05 15:26 | neil_smith | Triggers an Emergency Pack | => No |
| 2018-01-19 12:07 | alostale | Relationship added | related to 0034061 |
| 2018-01-19 12:11 | alostale | Note Added: 0101782 | |
| 2018-01-19 12:11 | alostale | Status | new => closed |
| 2018-01-19 12:11 | alostale | Resolution | open => no change required |
| 2018-01-19 14:52 | neil_smith | Note Added: 0101802 | |
| 2018-03-02 16:52 | neil_smith | Note Added: 0102941 | |
|
Issue History |
| Copyright © 2000 - 2009 MantisBT Group |
 |