Project:
View Issue Details[ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | |||||||||||
ID | ||||||||||||
0025179 | ||||||||||||
Type | Category | Severity | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Last Update | |||||||
design defect | [Openbravo ERP] B. User interface | minor | always | 2013-11-19 10:08 | 2014-01-15 09:01 | |||||||
Reporter | jsetuain | View Status | public | |||||||||
Assigned To | dbaz | |||||||||||
Priority | normal | Resolution | open | Fixed in Version | ||||||||
Status | new | Fix in branch | Fixed in SCM revision | |||||||||
Projection | none | ETA | none | Target Version | ||||||||
OS | Any | Database | Any | Java version | ||||||||
OS Version | Database version | Ant version | ||||||||||
Product Version | SCM revision | |||||||||||
Review Assigned To | ||||||||||||
Web browser | Apple Safari, Google Chrome | |||||||||||
Modules | Core | |||||||||||
Regression level | ||||||||||||
Regression date | ||||||||||||
Regression introduced in release | ||||||||||||
Regression introduced by commit | ||||||||||||
Triggers an Emergency Pack | No | |||||||||||
Summary | 0025179: Grids looses column sorting and/or filters | |||||||||||
Description | Grids looses column sorting and/or filters. | |||||||||||
Steps To Reproduce | In OB grid view with say >= 10 rows: 1. select several distinct rows 2. click a header to sort by that column 3. the selection is gone idem with filters: 1. select several distinct rows 2. type in a filter in one of the column headers 3. the selection is gone In both cases, the selection should remain across sort/filter, to allow for complex selections (based on different sorting/filtering). | |||||||||||
Proposed Solution | In both cases, the selection should remain across sort/filter, to allow for complex selections (based on different sorting/filtering). | |||||||||||
Tags | No tags attached. | |||||||||||
Attached Files | ||||||||||||
Relationships [ Relation Graph ] [ Dependency Graph ] | |
Notes | |
(0063399) alostale (manager) 2014-01-14 13:59 |
Moving to design defect (should it be FR?): This requires, specially for keeping selection after filter change, of a proper design. How should it behave in case selected record doesn't fit new filters? Should it be st similar to pin records in P&E windows? |
Issue History | |||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
2013-11-19 10:08 | jsetuain | New Issue | |
2013-11-19 10:08 | jsetuain | Assigned To | => dbaz |
2013-11-19 10:08 | jsetuain | Web browser | => Apple Safari, Google Chrome |
2013-11-19 10:08 | jsetuain | Modules | => Core |
2013-11-19 10:08 | jsetuain | Triggers an Emergency Pack | => No |
2014-01-14 13:59 | alostale | Web browser | Apple Safari, Google Chrome => Apple Safari, Google Chrome |
2014-01-14 13:59 | alostale | Note Added: 0063399 | |
2014-01-14 13:59 | alostale | Type | defect => design defect |
2014-01-15 09:01 | shuehner | Issue Monitored: shuehner |
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 MantisBT Group |