Anonymous | Login
Project:
RSS
  
News | My View | View Issues | Roadmap | Summary

View Issue DetailsJump to Notes ] Issue History ] Print ]
ID
0020477
TypeCategorySeverityReproducibilityDate SubmittedLast Update
feature request[Modules] Cuaderno 34majoralways2012-05-11 14:082012-06-07 17:34
ReporterVictorVillarView Statuspublic 
Assigned Tojecharri 
PriorityurgentResolutionopenFixed in Version
StatusnewFix in branchFixed in SCM revision
ProjectionnoneETAnoneTarget Version
OSAnyDatabaseAnyJava version
OS VersionDatabase versionAnt version
Product VersionSCM revision 
Regression date
Regression introduced by commit
Regression level
Review Assigned To
Regression introduced in release
Summary

0020477: wrong remittance file created in some cases

Descriptionwrong remittance file created in some cases:

1.if the remittance has a sales invoice with total gross amount negative

2.- It the remittance has a sales invoice with total gross amount negative and a payment in for the same Business partner in sales invoice with total amount positive.

In the first case the remittance file shows negative symbol and in the second appears negative symbol and the total is something strange.

Examples:

the first attached file is a C34 remittance which contains a sales invoice (-1600 €) and a positive payment in (950€). That is, it must customer paid 650€ (more or less). the attached file BANK 37

The second file, the attached file BANK 39, is a remittance file with negative sales invoice.
Steps To Reproduce1.if the remittance has a sales invoice with total gross amount negative

2.- It the remittance has a sales invoice with total gross amount negative and a payment in for the same Business partner in sales invoice with total amount positive.

In the first case the remittance file shows negative symbol and in the second appears negative symbol and the total is something strange
TagsNo tags attached.
Attached Files? file icon BANK(39).DAT [^] (814 bytes) 2012-05-11 14:09
? file icon BANK(37).DAT [^] (1,258 bytes) 2012-05-11 14:09

- Relationships Relation Graph ] Dependency Graph ]

-  Notes
(0048581)
VictorVillar (manager)
2012-05-11 14:11

Support Ticket No: 15373
Deadline: 11/06/2012
(0049685)
jecharri (developer)
2012-06-07 17:34

Finally, the decision has been to change from defect to feature request because with our standard configuration the problem is imposible.
However it can be an interesting implementation

- Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
2012-05-11 14:08 VictorVillar New Issue
2012-05-11 14:08 VictorVillar Assigned To => eduardo_Argal
2012-05-11 14:09 VictorVillar File Added: BANK(39).DAT
2012-05-11 14:09 VictorVillar File Added: BANK(37).DAT
2012-05-11 14:11 VictorVillar Note Added: 0048581
2012-05-11 14:11 VictorVillar Issue Monitored: networkb
2012-05-11 16:17 azabaleta Issue Monitored: azabaleta
2012-06-01 09:04 jonalegriaesarte Assigned To eduardo_Argal => jecharri
2012-06-07 17:34 jecharri Note Added: 0049685
2012-06-07 17:34 jecharri Type defect => feature request


Copyright © 2000 - 2009 MantisBT Group
Powered by Mantis Bugtracker