Project:
View Issue Details[ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | |||||||||||
ID | ||||||||||||
0018887 | ||||||||||||
Type | Category | Severity | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Last Update | |||||||
design defect | [Openbravo ERP] 08. Project and service management | major | have not tried | 2011-10-26 18:34 | 2012-05-10 12:13 | |||||||
Reporter | RenateNieuwkoop | View Status | public | |||||||||
Assigned To | mirurita | |||||||||||
Priority | normal | Resolution | open | Fixed in Version | ||||||||
Status | new | Fix in branch | Fixed in SCM revision | |||||||||
Projection | none | ETA | none | Target Version | ||||||||
OS | Any | Database | Any | Java version | ||||||||
OS Version | Database version | Ant version | ||||||||||
Product Version | 3.0MP4.1 | SCM revision | ||||||||||
Review Assigned To | ||||||||||||
Web browser | ||||||||||||
Modules | Core | |||||||||||
Regression level | ||||||||||||
Regression date | ||||||||||||
Regression introduced in release | ||||||||||||
Regression introduced by commit | ||||||||||||
Triggers an Emergency Pack | No | |||||||||||
Summary | 0018887: Service Project: Proposal functionality needs reviewing | |||||||||||
Description | The functionality of the proposals need to be reviewed. There is a checkbox 'Sales Transaction' that can be selected, but the outcome of the process remains the same. In both cases when the winning bid is processed, the Business Partner in the main section gets overwritten with the business partner that won the bid. In the case of a 'sales transaction' I can imagine that would be the case, but not for those not marked as sales transaction. Furthermore if the proposal does not get marked as 'sales transaction' you would assume that the business partner in the supplier gets overwritten by the business partner that won the proposal, but this is not the case. The supplier information always remains the same. Another thing is that when a proposal is not marked as 'sales transaction', that the Planned PO Net Unit Price gets updated, however, in all cases the Planned SO Net Unit Price is overwritten by the Net Unit price in the proposal and the Planned PO Net Unit Price is always left blank. | |||||||||||
Steps To Reproduce | Enter a Service Project with in the main tab: BP: Moonlight Restaurant Payment Method: Wire Transfer Payment Terms: 30 days select 'Create Temporary Price List' In the project Line tab enter: Product: Ale Beer Quantity: 10 Planned SO Net Unit Price: 0.80 Planned PO Net Unit Price: 0.60 Supplier tab: BP: Happy Drinks Price List: Happy Drinks Price List Proposal Tab: Proposal 1: Sales Transaction checkbox selected BP: Be Soft drinker Payment Method: Cash Payment Terms: 60 days Proposal Line tab: Line 1: Product: Apple Juice Quantity: 20 Net Unit Price: 1.00 Line 2: Product: Apple Juice Bio Quantity: 30 Net Unit Price: 0.75 Back in the Proposal Tab: Proposal 2: Sales Transaction checkbox selected BP: Fruit & Bio Payment Method: Check Payment Terms: 120 days Proposal Line tab: Line 1: Product: Apple Juice Quantity: 25 Net Unit Price: 0.80 Line 2: Product: Cola Quantity: 50 Net Unit Price: 0.50 It is then decided that the 2nd proposal is the winner. You select the 2nd proposal and click Process a winning bid. After that you change the status of the project to Order. Then you Create Purchase Order from Project and the sales order from Project. This is the end of the scenario. Now you repeat all steps with the only exception that for the 2 proposals you enter, you DO NOT select the Sales Transaction checkbox. If you compare the outcome of both, you will see they are exactly the same. | |||||||||||
Tags | VMA-Reviewed | |||||||||||
Attached Files | ||||||||||||
Relationships [ Relation Graph ] [ Dependency Graph ] | |
Issue History | |||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
2011-10-26 18:34 | RenateNieuwkoop | New Issue | |
2011-10-26 18:34 | RenateNieuwkoop | Assigned To | => jonalegriaesarte |
2011-10-26 18:34 | RenateNieuwkoop | Modules | => Core |
2012-02-15 19:04 | iciordia | Assigned To | jonalegriaesarte => vmromanos |
2012-02-16 17:03 | vmromanos | Type | defect => design defect |
2012-02-16 17:03 | vmromanos | Tag Attached: VMA-Reviewed | |
2012-05-10 12:13 | gorka_gil | Assigned To | vmromanos => mirurita |
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 MantisBT Group |