Project:
View Issue Details[ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | |||||||
ID | ||||||||
0014553 | ||||||||
Type | Category | Severity | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Last Update | |||
defect | [Openbravo ERP] 00. Application dictionary | major | always | 2010-09-14 18:33 | 2010-10-19 00:00 | |||
Reporter | networkb | View Status | public | |||||
Assigned To | marvintm | |||||||
Priority | urgent | Resolution | open | Fixed in Version | ||||
Status | closed | Fix in branch | pi | Fixed in SCM revision | ||||
Projection | none | ETA | none | Target Version | 2.50MP23 | |||
OS | Any | Database | Any | Java version | ||||
OS Version | Database version | Ant version | ||||||
Product Version | 2.50MP21 | SCM revision | ||||||
Review Assigned To | ||||||||
Web browser | ||||||||
Modules | Core | |||||||
Regression level | ||||||||
Regression date | ||||||||
Regression introduced in release | ||||||||
Regression introduced by commit | ||||||||
Triggers an Emergency Pack | No | |||||||
Summary | 0014553: Dataset 'Client Definition' --> There are tables that do not meet the validation | |||||||
Description | In the dataset Client definiton there are tables that do not meet the validation, IE: M_Warehouse (it appears as **M_Warehouse) | |||||||
Steps To Reproduce | - As System Administrator go to Application Dictionary || Dataset || Dataset - Select 'Client definiton' - Go to Table, sekect M_Warehouse, realize that the name of the table appears with '**' | |||||||
Tags | No tags attached. | |||||||
Attached Files | ||||||||
Relationships [ Relation Graph ] [ Dependency Graph ] | ||||||||
|
Notes | |
(0031508) alostale (manager) 2010-09-30 11:48 |
The problem is the validation checks tables access level with dataset access level. Client Definition dataset has System Only access level, which seems to be incorrect. Can you confirm and change if it is wrong? |
(0031518) networkb (developer) 2010-09-30 14:11 |
This data set is defined as System only access what probably is wrong. But Client definition dataset is used when exporting the client, so needs to export tables defined with "system/Client" access level and also tables with "client/organization" access level. For example c_currency tables has "system/client" access level, and m_inout table has "cliente/organization" access level, and both has to be exported as part of client definition dataset. In this case the validation has not sense because the client definition dataset has to include tables with different type of access level. |
(0031916) marvintm (developer) 2010-10-18 16:20 |
The Import/Export client will be refactored in the comming months, according to the plan described in the following feature request: https://issues.openbravo.com/view.php?id=14848 [^] Therefore, this change will not be done. Instead, the way import client decides which tables it needs to export will be automatically computed. This feature request will be implemented before Openbravo 3.0. |
Issue History | |||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
2010-09-14 18:33 | networkb | New Issue | |
2010-09-14 18:33 | networkb | Assigned To | => alostale |
2010-09-20 08:58 | alostale | Target Version | 2.50MP22 => 2.50MP23 |
2010-09-20 08:58 | alostale | Status | new => scheduled |
2010-09-20 08:58 | alostale | fix_in_branch | => pi |
2010-09-30 11:48 | alostale | Assigned To | alostale => adrianromero |
2010-09-30 11:48 | alostale | Note Added: 0031508 | |
2010-09-30 12:02 | psarobe | Status | scheduled => feedback |
2010-09-30 14:11 | networkb | Note Added: 0031518 | |
2010-09-30 14:12 | networkb | Assigned To | adrianromero => alostale |
2010-09-30 14:12 | networkb | Status | feedback => new |
2010-10-04 08:41 | alostale | Status | new => scheduled |
2010-10-06 10:19 | alostale | Assigned To | alostale => marvintm |
2010-10-18 16:18 | marvintm | Relationship added | related to 0014848 |
2010-10-18 16:20 | marvintm | Note Added: 0031916 | |
2010-10-18 16:20 | marvintm | Status | scheduled => closed |
2010-10-19 00:00 | anonymous | sf_bug_id | 0 => 3090007 |
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 MantisBT Group |