Project:
View Issue Details[ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | |||||||
ID | ||||||||
0001126 | ||||||||
Type | Category | Severity | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Last Update | |||
defect | [Openbravo ERP] 04. Warehouse management | minor | always | 2007-04-16 11:21 | 2008-06-12 09:43 | |||
Reporter | user71 | View Status | public | |||||
Assigned To | user71 | |||||||
Priority | normal | Resolution | fixed | Fixed in Version | ||||
Status | closed | Fix in branch | Fixed in SCM revision | |||||
Projection | none | ETA | none | Target Version | ||||
OS | Any | Database | Any | Java version | ||||
OS Version | Database version | Ant version | ||||||
Product Version | SCM revision | |||||||
Review Assigned To | ||||||||
Web browser | ||||||||
Modules | Core | |||||||
Regression level | ||||||||
Regression date | ||||||||
Regression introduced in release | ||||||||
Regression introduced by commit | ||||||||
Triggers an Emergency Pack | No | |||||||
Summary | 0001126: Payments created in a Remittance are erroneously cancelled | |||||||
Description | There are two rules in Debt-Payment management that are not working properly when running together: -When processing an Invoice the system creates a debt-payment for the total amount of the Invoice. If there is a pending debt-payment for the same vendor/customer and with opposite amount -same value and different sign- the system automatically cancels both debt-payments. -When creating a Remittance, for each debt-payment included in the remittance a new debt-payment is created, with same vendor/customer and opposite amount. In the due date the original and opposite debt-payments are manually cancelled. The problem arises when processing an Invoice and there are debt-payments for that vendor/customer that are in a Remittance and they are not cancelled yet. Then the debt-payment generated in the Invoice is automatically -and erroneously- cancelled with the negative debt-payment in previous remittance. | |||||||
Tags | No tags attached. | |||||||
Attached Files | ||||||||
Relationships [ Relation Graph ] [ Dependency Graph ] | |
Notes | |
(0000979) user71 2007-04-16 11:29 edited on: 2008-06-12 09:18 |
Logged In: YES user_id=1504831 Originator: NO There was a mistake in remittance settlements when they where consolidated. All the debt/payments generated in these remittances must have the bank as business partner in spite of the original business partners |
(0004715) user71 2005-06-01 00:00 edited on: 2008-06-12 09:43 |
This bug was originally reported in SourceForge bug tracker and then migrated to Mantis. You can see the original bug report in: https://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=1701374 [^] |
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 MantisBT Group |