Anonymous | Login
News | My View | View Issues | Roadmap | Summary

View Issue DetailsJump to Notes ] Issue History ] Print ]
TypeCategorySeverityReproducibilityDate SubmittedLast Update
feature request[Openbravo ERP] 00. Application dictionarymajoralways2009-10-06 19:282010-08-30 15:49
ReportergalderromoView Statuspublic 
Assigned Toiciordia 
PriorityurgentResolutionopenFixed in Version
StatusacknowledgedFix in branchFixed in SCM revision
ProjectionnoneETAnoneTarget Version
OSLinux 32 bitDatabaseOracleJava version1.5.0_15
OS VersionGentoo 2.6.24Database versionXEAnt version1.7
Product Version2.50MP5SCM revision 
Review Assigned To
Web browser
Regression level
Regression date
Regression introduced in release
Regression introduced by commit
Triggers an Emergency PackNo

0010886: Synchronize terminology

DescriptionTaking into account new development approach when including in core tables new columns, Synchronize terminology should be updated.

If you have a column in any of the standard tables called dateinvoiced, this column will have a element.

If you now want to include a new column called dateinvoiced on a existing core table, you need to create it as EM_dateinvoiced. It can also happen, the column you are including is EM_AE_dateinvoiced where AE is DBprefix for a new module.

When you execute synchronize terminology, a new element is created.

- you need to translate something is already translated
- you duplicate records
Steps To Reproduce-Look for a existing element. Have a look at the column in that element, for example AAA.

-Create a column in a core table (in the example AAA)
-You will need to create a EM_AAA
-Synchronize terminology.
-New element different from step one is created.
Proposed SolutionSynchronize terminology should check not only for identical columns but also to columns with EM_ or EM_DBPrefix_.
Tagsdev-platform-quick-wins, Modularity
Attached Files

- Relationships Relation Graph ] Dependency Graph ]

-  Notes
galderromo (reporter)
2009-10-06 19:33

Should be considered if is a bug or not. In my opinion, Synchronize Terminology is not working as was thought to work. Although is working as was designed. I guess is a bug.
rafaroda (developer)
2009-10-07 07:23

Very good point Galder. Any comment Isma? Feature request or really a defect?

- Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
2009-10-06 19:28 galderromo New Issue
2009-10-06 19:28 galderromo Assigned To => rafaroda
2009-10-06 19:33 galderromo Note Added: 0020796
2009-10-07 07:23 rafaroda Note Added: 0020801
2009-10-07 07:23 rafaroda Assigned To rafaroda => iciordia
2009-10-07 07:23 rafaroda Priority high => urgent
2009-10-07 07:23 rafaroda Status new => acknowledged
2009-10-07 07:23 rafaroda Issue Monitored: rafaroda
2009-10-07 07:24 rafaroda Tag Attached: Modularity
2009-10-07 14:59 shuehner Issue Monitored: shuehner
2010-08-30 15:49 rafaroda Tag Attached: dev-platform-quick-wins

Copyright © 2000 - 2009 MantisBT Group
Powered by Mantis Bugtracker