Project:
View Issue Details[ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | |||||||
ID | ||||||||
0006862 | ||||||||
Type | Category | Severity | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Last Update | |||
defect | [Openbravo ERP] 01. General setup | minor | have not tried | 2009-01-13 10:58 | 2009-04-21 10:53 | |||
Reporter | pmagnin | View Status | public | |||||
Assigned To | artem | |||||||
Priority | normal | Resolution | fixed | Fixed in Version | 2.50 | |||
Status | closed | Fix in branch | pi | Fixed in SCM revision | 484b7cdc33d8 | |||
Projection | none | ETA | none | Target Version | 2.50 | |||
OS | Any | Database | Any | Java version | ||||
OS Version | Database version | Ant version | ||||||
Product Version | pi | SCM revision | ||||||
Review Assigned To | ||||||||
Web browser | ||||||||
Modules | Core | |||||||
Regression level | ||||||||
Regression date | ||||||||
Regression introduced in release | ||||||||
Regression introduced by commit | ||||||||
Triggers an Emergency Pack | No | |||||||
Summary | 0006862: Two entries for the same payment method | |||||||
Description | We have two entries (Check and Cheque) for the Reference list "All_Payment Rule" Go to : Application Dictionary\Reference Choose : "All_Payment Rule" Go to : List Reference We should have only one entry for checks. If we can choose, "Check" is better than "Cheque" because US English has to be use in priority as far as we don't have a specific English country specific translation. | |||||||
Tags | commsup_sprint6, comsup_sprint8 | |||||||
Attached Files | ||||||||
Relationships [ Relation Graph ] [ Dependency Graph ] | |
Notes | |
(0012304) psarobe (manager) 2009-01-19 10:40 |
Please take into account when fixing that both values are not used for different things in the procedures stored |
(0013659) artem (reporter) 2009-02-18 14:19 |
We have two entries (Check and Cheque) for the Reference list "C_Payment Tender Type" as well. |
(0013679) svnbot (reporter) 2009-02-18 17:19 |
Repository: openbravo Revision: 13323 Author: hennadzi Date: 2009-02-18 17:19:46 +0100 (Wed, 18 Feb 2009) Fixed bug 0006862: Two entries for the same payment method --- U trunk/src-db/database/sourcedata/AD_REF_LIST.xml --- https://dev.openbravo.com/websvn/openbravo/?rev=13323&sc=1 [^] |
(0014192) sureshbabu (reporter) 2009-03-02 07:52 |
Still i can able to see two entries (check, Cheque) in All_Payment Rule - List Reference Go to: Application Dictionary || Reference || Reference >> List Reference |
(0014319) Hennadzi (reporter) 2009-03-03 14:52 |
sureshbabu: Is it mandatory to delete Cheque from the list even if it is not active and user cannot choose it from dropdown? |
(0014475) psarobe (manager) 2009-03-06 10:18 |
Hennadzi, These two values, obviously, have different values so we must see if this can affect to the procedures stored. AS I said in my first note we have to verify if these two values are used for different things in the PL's. Can you confirm me that you review what I'm saying? |
(0014724) artem (reporter) 2009-03-17 14:49 |
I've checked PL's and can confirm that "Cheque", as instance, isn't used anywhere in logic, so I've deleted it. |
(0014725) hgbot (developer) 2009-03-17 14:54 |
Repository: erp/devel/pi Changeset: 484b7cdc33d8c58130d1969c74232701b7d2285f Author: Artem Zakolodkin <artem.zakolodkin <at> opensuite.com> Date: Tue Mar 17 15:51:29 2009 +0200 URL: http://code.openbravo.com/erp/devel/pi/rev/484b7cdc33d8c58130d1969c74232701b7d2285f [^] Fixed bug 0006862: Two entries for the same payment method --- M src-db/database/sourcedata/AD_REF_LIST.xml M src-db/database/sourcedata/AD_VAL_RULE.xml --- |
Issue History | |||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
2009-01-13 10:58 | pmagnin | New Issue | |
2009-01-13 10:58 | pmagnin | Assigned To | => rafaroda |
2009-01-13 10:58 | pmagnin | sf_bug_id | 0 => 2504171 |
2009-01-13 10:58 | pmagnin | Regression testing | => No |
2009-01-19 10:40 | psarobe | Status | new => scheduled |
2009-01-19 10:40 | psarobe | Note Added: 0012304 | |
2009-01-19 10:40 | psarobe | fix_in_branch | => trunk |
2009-02-17 14:40 | PavelPonomarev | Assigned To | rafaroda => Hennadzi |
2009-02-18 14:19 | artem | Note Added: 0013659 | |
2009-02-18 17:19 | svnbot | Checkin | |
2009-02-18 17:19 | svnbot | Note Added: 0013679 | |
2009-02-18 17:19 | svnbot | Status | scheduled => resolved |
2009-02-18 17:19 | svnbot | Resolution | open => fixed |
2009-02-18 17:19 | svnbot | svn_revision | => 13323 |
2009-02-20 09:33 | PavelPonomarev | Tag Attached: commsup_sprint6 | |
2009-03-02 07:52 | sureshbabu | Status | resolved => new |
2009-03-02 07:52 | sureshbabu | Resolution | fixed => open |
2009-03-02 07:52 | sureshbabu | Note Added: 0014192 | |
2009-03-03 14:52 | Hennadzi | Note Added: 0014319 | |
2009-03-03 14:52 | Hennadzi | Status | new => feedback |
2009-03-06 10:07 | psarobe | Status | feedback => scheduled |
2009-03-06 10:07 | psarobe | fix_in_branch | pi => |
2009-03-06 10:07 | psarobe | Status | scheduled => resolved |
2009-03-06 10:07 | psarobe | Resolution | open => fixed |
2009-03-06 10:16 | psarobe | Status | resolved => new |
2009-03-06 10:16 | psarobe | Resolution | fixed => open |
2009-03-06 10:16 | psarobe | Status | new => feedback |
2009-03-06 10:18 | psarobe | Note Added: 0014475 | |
2009-03-16 10:26 | PavelPonomarev | Assigned To | Hennadzi => artem |
2009-03-16 11:07 | rafaroda | Status | feedback => scheduled |
2009-03-16 11:07 | rafaroda | fix_in_branch | => pi |
2009-03-17 14:49 | artem | Note Added: 0014724 | |
2009-03-17 14:54 | hgbot | Checkin | |
2009-03-17 14:54 | hgbot | Note Added: 0014725 | |
2009-03-17 14:54 | hgbot | Status | scheduled => resolved |
2009-03-17 14:54 | hgbot | Resolution | open => fixed |
2009-03-17 14:54 | hgbot | Fixed in SCM revision | 13323 => http://code.openbravo.com/erp/devel/pi/rev/484b7cdc33d8c58130d1969c74232701b7d2285f [^] |
2009-03-17 14:55 | artem | Tag Attached: comsup_sprint8 | |
2009-04-21 10:53 | psarobe | Status | resolved => closed |
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 MantisBT Group |