Project:
| View Issue Details[ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | |||||||||||
| ID | ||||||||||||
| 0006227 | ||||||||||||
| Type | Category | Severity | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Last Update | |||||||
| feature request | [Mantis @ OB] Others | minor | have not tried | 2008-11-27 13:02 | 2011-08-24 12:58 | |||||||
| Reporter | gorkaion | View Status | public | |||||||||
| Assigned To | gorka_gil | |||||||||||
| Priority | normal | Resolution | open | |||||||||
| Status | new | Fix in branch | Fixed in SCM revision | |||||||||
| Projection | none | ETA | none | |||||||||
| OS | Linux 32 bit | Database | Oracle | Java version | 1.5.0_15 | |||||||
| OS Version | Gentoo | Database version | 11g | Ant version | 1.7.0 | |||||||
| Review Assigned To | ||||||||||||
| Summary | 0006227: Automatically close backports of rejected defects | |||||||||||
| Description | When you reject a defect with a 'not a bug' it would be good if the existing backports get also closed with the same reason/description. Notice that this will be only with the 'not a bug' option. From my point of view, if we check the 'not a bug' option it won't never be a bug in any branch. Most of time these bugs should have been feature request. In the case that a branch might require a fix we should use in the parent defect the 'no change required' option, old 'out of time'. That stands for, it was a bug but because of new developments or other bug fixing it is now solved. | |||||||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | |||||||||||
| Attached Files | ||||||||||||
 Relationships [ Relation Graph ]
[ Dependency Graph ]
|
|
 Relationships |
|
Notes |
|
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
|
Notes |
|
Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 2008-11-27 13:02 | gorkaion | New Issue | |
| 2009-11-18 18:20 | jpabloae | Assigned To | => jpabloae |
| 2011-08-24 12:58 | jpabloae | Assigned To | jpabloae => gorka_gil |
|
Issue History |
| Copyright © 2000 - 2009 MantisBT Group |
 |