Anonymous | Login
Project:
RSS
  
News | My View | View Issues | Roadmap | Summary

View Issue DetailsJump to Notes ] Issue History ] Print ]
ID
0041980
TypeCategorySeverityReproducibilityDate SubmittedLast Update
defect[Retail Modules] Web POSminorhave not tried2019-10-10 11:512019-10-10 11:55
ReporterplujanView Statuspublic 
Assigned ToRetail 
PrioritynormalResolutionopenFixed in Version
StatusnewFix in branchFixed in SCM revision
ProjectionnoneETAnoneTarget Version
OSAnyDatabaseAnyJava version
OS VersionDatabase versionAnt version
Product VersionmainSCM revision 
Review Assigned To
Regression level
Regression date
Regression introduced in release
Regression introduced by commit
Triggers an Emergency PackNo
Summary

0041980: [19Q4] [Restaurants] Tables do not look good when the maximum name length is used

DescriptionWhen creating a Table, I am able to use 50 char to name it. However, the frontend UI is not prepared for names longer than 10 char.
Steps To Reproduce1. In the backend, go to Resource and create or edit a Table.
2. Type in the name a 50 char name and save.
3. In the frontend, open the resource assignation. Check the table with the long name does not look good. Find an example in the attached screenshot.
TagsNo tags attached.
Attached Filespng file icon TableWithLongName.png [^] (49,892 bytes) 2019-10-10 11:51

- Relationships Relation Graph ] Dependency Graph ]

-  Notes
There are no notes attached to this issue.

- Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
2019-10-10 11:51 plujan New Issue
2019-10-10 11:51 plujan Assigned To => Retail
2019-10-10 11:51 plujan File Added: TableWithLongName.png
2019-10-10 11:51 plujan Triggers an Emergency Pack => No
2019-10-10 11:54 plujan Summary [19Q4] [Restaurants] Tables do not looks good with using the maximum name length => [19Q4] [Restaurants] Tables do not look good with using the maximum name length
2019-10-10 11:55 plujan Summary [19Q4] [Restaurants] Tables do not look good with using the maximum name length => [19Q4] [Restaurants] Tables do not look good when the maximum name length is used


Copyright © 2000 - 2009 MantisBT Group
Powered by Mantis Bugtracker