Project:
| View Issue Details[ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | |||||||||||
| ID | ||||||||||||
| 0023156 | ||||||||||||
| Type | Category | Severity | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Last Update | |||||||
| design defect | [Localization Pack: Spain] AEAT 340 | minor | always | 2013-02-25 11:13 | 2013-02-25 13:28 | |||||||
| Reporter | egoitz | View Status | public | |||||||||
| Assigned To | vmromanos | |||||||||||
| Priority | high | Resolution | open | Fixed in Version | ||||||||
| Status | new | Fix in branch | Fixed in SCM revision | |||||||||
| Projection | none | ETA | none | Target Version | ||||||||
| OS | Any | Database | Any | Java version | ||||||||
| OS Version | Database version | Ant version | ||||||||||
| Product Version | SCM revision | |||||||||||
| Merge Request Status | ||||||||||||
| Regression date | ||||||||||||
| Regression introduced by commit | ||||||||||||
| Regression level | ||||||||||||
| Review Assigned To | ||||||||||||
| Support ticket | ||||||||||||
| OBNetwork customer | OBPS | |||||||||||
| Regression introduced in release | ||||||||||||
| Summary | 0023156: The 340 report should be designed to be able to define new javas to be executed for periods | |||||||||||
| Description | Right now is hardcoded with java should be executed depending the year. A better design should be to have the possibility to define which java to use on each year. It will simplify the maintenance. In this way you could publish a new module for a new year instead of publishing a new release of the module. | |||||||||||
| Steps To Reproduce | - | |||||||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | |||||||||||
| Attached Files | ||||||||||||
 Relationships [ Relation Graph ]
[ Dependency Graph ]
|
|
 Relationships |
|
Notes |
|
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
|
Notes |
|
Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 2013-02-25 11:13 | egoitz | New Issue | |
| 2013-02-25 11:13 | egoitz | Assigned To | => vmromanos |
| 2013-02-25 11:13 | egoitz | OBNetwork customer | => Yes |
| 2013-02-25 13:25 | psanjuan | Summary | The 340 report should be designed to be ablo to define new javas to be executed for periods => The 340 report should be designed to be able to define new javas to be executed for periods |
|
Issue History |
| Copyright © 2000 - 2009 MantisBT Group |
 |