Project:
View Issue Details[ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | |||||||
ID | ||||||||
0009083 | ||||||||
Type | Category | Severity | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Last Update | |||
defect | [Openbravo ERP] 00. Application dictionary | minor | always | 2009-05-19 12:25 | 2009-05-21 00:00 | |||
Reporter | networkb | View Status | public | |||||
Assigned To | alostale | |||||||
Priority | immediate | Resolution | no change required | Fixed in Version | ||||
Status | closed | Fix in branch | Fixed in SCM revision | |||||
Projection | none | ETA | none | Target Version | ||||
OS | Any | Database | Any | Java version | ||||
OS Version | Database version | Ant version | ||||||
Product Version | 2.40 | SCM revision | ||||||
Review Assigned To | ||||||||
Web browser | ||||||||
Modules | Core | |||||||
Regression level | ||||||||
Regression date | ||||||||
Regression introduced in release | ||||||||
Regression introduced by commit | ||||||||
Triggers an Emergency Pack | No | |||||||
Summary | 0009083: Read Only Logic does not work if the clausure does not include a column from the table | |||||||
Description | A read only logic does not work if the clausure is like: @#AD_User_ID@!1000000 The javascript function created is: function readOnlyLogic() { readOnlyLogicElement('ColumnName', (strAD_User_ID != 1000000)); return true; } It seems that a field called strAD_User_ID should be a column from the table. This column does not exist in the table so, the Read Only Logic does not work | |||||||
Steps To Reproduce | Go to Application Dictionary > Tables and Columns > C_BPartner. Search column: name. In Read Only Logic add: @#AD_User_ID@!1000000 Compile the window. Login the application using an user <> 1000000 | |||||||
Proposed Solution | It exists a workaround: Create an Auxiliary input like: @SQL=SELECT AD_USER_ID FROM AD_USER WHERE AD_USER_ID = @#AD_User_ID@ In Read Only logic use: @AuxiliaryInputName@!1000000 | |||||||
Tags | No tags attached. | |||||||
Attached Files | ||||||||
Relationships [ Relation Graph ] [ Dependency Graph ] | ||||||||
|
Notes | |
(0016462) rafaroda (developer) 2009-05-19 12:28 |
Asier, Could you please determine whether this is a defect or not? Thanks. |
(0016481) alostale (manager) 2009-05-20 08:35 |
A feature request (0009098) has been created from this issue. This issue is not going to be fixed as it has a simple workaround (described above). |
Issue History | |||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
2009-05-19 12:25 | networkb | New Issue | |
2009-05-19 12:25 | networkb | Assigned To | => rafaroda |
2009-05-19 12:25 | networkb | Regression testing | => No |
2009-05-19 12:27 | rafaroda | Assigned To | rafaroda => alostale |
2009-05-19 12:28 | rafaroda | Note Added: 0016462 | |
2009-05-20 08:33 | alostale | Issue cloned | 0009098 |
2009-05-20 08:33 | alostale | Relationship added | related to 0009098 |
2009-05-20 08:35 | alostale | Status | new => closed |
2009-05-20 08:35 | alostale | Note Added: 0016481 | |
2009-05-20 08:35 | alostale | Resolution | open => no change required |
2009-05-21 00:00 | anonymous | sf_bug_id | 0 => 2794609 |
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 MantisBT Group |