Project:
| View Issue Details[ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||||
| ID | |||||||||||
| 0004376 | |||||||||||
| Type | Category | Severity | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||||
| feature request | [Openbravo ERP] 01. General setup | major | have not tried | 2008-07-11 08:47 | 2011-09-08 13:23 | ||||||
| Reporter | sudhagark | View Status | public | ||||||||
| Assigned To | rmorley | ||||||||||
| Priority | normal | Resolution | open | Fixed in Version | |||||||
| Status | acknowledged | Fix in branch | Fixed in SCM revision | ||||||||
| Projection | @40@ | ETA | none | Target Version | pi | ||||||
| OS | Windows | Database | PostgreSQL | Java version | 1.5 | ||||||
| OS Version | Xp | Database version | 8.2 | Ant version | 1.7.0 | ||||||
| Product Version | SCM revision | ||||||||||
| Review Assigned To | |||||||||||
| Web browser | |||||||||||
| Modules | Core | ||||||||||
| Regression level | |||||||||||
| Regression date | |||||||||||
| Regression introduced in release | |||||||||||
| Regression introduced by commit | |||||||||||
| Triggers an Emergency Pack | No | ||||||||||
| Summary | 0004376: Approval System in Openbravo | ||||||||||
| Description | Hi All, I am using OB 2.35 MP4 version with Postgre. I want to get a clarification in openbravo. We are having a approval amount field in Generel>Role window. We are getting the supervisor name in Users>Header window. I want to know what is the use of getting those values in the setup. If openbravo using this funnality where they are using concept in the application. Also we have a status called 'Not Approved' in sale order document status Sales Management>Sale Order>Header window. If we complete a sale order the document status will be changed into 'completed' directly. How to move the status into 'Not Approved'. | ||||||||||
| Tags | ModuleCandidate, ReleaseCandidate | ||||||||||
| Attached Files | |||||||||||
 Relationships [ Relation Graph ]
[ Dependency Graph ]
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
 Relationships |
|
Notes |
|
|
(0008273) pjuvara (reporter) 2008-07-11 09:04 |
Openbravo currently does not support approval workflows and the document statuses are for the large part fixed. We intend to implement this as part of the integration with a BPM engine |
|
(0008275) sudhagark (reporter) 2008-07-11 09:06 |
Is it possible to use the supervisor field and approval amount field during the setup. |
|
(0008276) pjuvara (reporter) 2008-07-11 09:44 |
Please use the forums and not the issue tracker to ask functional questions. http://sourceforge.net/forum/?group_id=162271 [^] |
|
(0010716) RenateNieuwkoop (reporter) 2008-11-26 15:30 |
Hi Paolo, Just a note to indicate that we get a lot of questions from students about the approval for Purchase Orders also, so it would be good to have this functionality in the future. regards, renate |
|
(0015373) erpnedir (reporter) 2009-04-15 22:54 |
A simple approved status, working effective with an approval limit in user setup window can cover the basic need. The database already has the fields. We wish to see this enhancement in the new release. |
|
(0019421) rafaroda (developer) 2009-09-02 13:27 |
According to http://wiki.openbravo.com/wiki/Bug_Reporting_Guidelines#How_to_Choose_the_Right_Severity [^] feature requests should not have Severity Critical. If there no reason why they are Critical please down their priority to Major: * New functionality that would significantly increase the user base of the product. * Usability improvements. Thanks. |
|
(0035324) dalsasua (reporter) 2011-03-29 12:48 |
Reduced the severity, according to our reporting guidelines[1], because a FR cannot be critical: [1] http://wiki.openbravo.com/wiki/Bug_Reporting_Guidelines#How_to_Choose_the_Right_Severity [^] |
|
Notes |
|
Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 2008-07-11 08:47 | sudhagark | New Issue | |
| 2008-07-11 08:47 | sudhagark | Assigned To | => cromero |
| 2008-07-11 08:47 | sudhagark | sf_bug_id | 0 => 2015725 |
| 2008-07-11 09:01 | pjuvara | Assigned To | cromero => alostale |
| 2008-07-11 09:01 | pjuvara | Status | new => acknowledged |
| 2008-07-11 09:02 | pjuvara | Relationship added | blocks 0003358 |
| 2008-07-11 09:04 | pjuvara | Note Added: 0008273 | |
| 2008-07-11 09:06 | sudhagark | Note Added: 0008275 | |
| 2008-07-11 09:44 | pjuvara | Note Added: 0008276 | |
| 2008-07-14 19:08 | pjuvara | Tag Attached: ReleaseCandidate | |
| 2008-07-14 19:09 | pjuvara | Projection | none => @40@ |
| 2008-07-14 19:09 | pjuvara | Target Version | => 2.60 |
| 2008-11-16 07:44 | pjuvara | Assigned To | alostale => pjuvara |
| 2008-11-21 17:05 | pjuvara | Target Version | 2.60 => trunk |
| 2008-11-22 23:39 | pjuvara | Tag Attached: ModuleCandidate | |
| 2008-11-26 15:30 | RenateNieuwkoop | Note Added: 0010716 | |
| 2009-04-15 22:54 | erpnedir | Note Added: 0015373 | |
| 2009-09-02 13:27 | rafaroda | Note Added: 0019421 | |
| 2011-02-04 09:12 | jpabloae | Assigned To | pjuvara => rmorley |
| 2011-03-29 12:48 | dalsasua | Note Added: 0035324 | |
| 2011-03-29 12:53 | dalsasua | Severity | critical => major |
| 2011-03-29 12:53 | dalsasua | version | 2.35MP4 => |
| 2011-09-08 13:23 | eintelau | Issue Monitored: eintelau | |
|
Issue History |
| Copyright © 2000 - 2009 MantisBT Group |
 |