0030822: Different information shown when printing Journal Entries Report in PDF and XLS format depending on source

Notes
(0084382) markmm82 (developer) 2016-02-21 16:49 edited on: 2019-11-07 14:33	Reproducing steps I have a doubdt if it is an issue or the current behaviour has makes sense: Steps: 0. Access Journal Entries Report window and filter by date from=17-03-2015, date to= 17-03-2015, org= West Coast, Ledger= International Group USD, Document type= AR Invoice 1. Print filtered journal entry and realize that "Legal Entity", "Organization", "Date Range" and "General Ledger" information is shown in the title. In this scenario (scenario 1) filters are defined: date from=17-03-2015, date to= 17-03-2015, org= West Coast, Ledger= International Group USD, Document type= AR Invoice According these filters we obtain a PDF that includes "Legal Entity", "Organization", "Date Range" and "General Ledger", necessary to give more information about the obtained results where came from. Then, if we executed (second scenario): 2. Access Sales Invoice 1000161 and press "Post" button to review document's accounting entry (you will be carried to Journal Entries Report window) The Journal Entries Report window makes a DIRECT load for the journals from the selected Sales Invoice and due that the filters are not filled inside the windows. I think it is correct. 3. Press "PDF" button to print this specific entry and realize that "Organization" and "Date Range" information is not shown in the title Concluding, at time of the PDF printing, the fields "Organization" and "Date Range" are included to the report if they were defined in the UI as filters. At steps 2 and 3, these fields are not defined because the report will represent a non filtered result by Date range and Organization, but a direct and specific one (by a Sales invoice). Questions: If the PDF always represents results matching selected filters, could be logic (and correct) the current behaviour? I think yes! If we add to the report Date range and Organization information, without make a filtering by these fields (second scenario), the report may be confused, because not necessarily the only results for this date range and organization must be the loaded directly from the Sales invoice selected. This report will be ambiguos, and we will be able to obtain for the same "Legal Entity", "Organization", "Date Range" and "General Ledger" two differents reports when executing in a similar way than scenario 1, or from other workflows like scenario 2. In the case that the behaviour must be changed to always show the fields, what I can take like the date range? Thanks

Issue History
Date Modified	Username	Field	Change
2015-09-14 18:55	maite	New Issue
2015-09-14 18:55	maite	Assigned To	=> Triage Finance
2015-09-14 18:55	maite	Modules	=> Core
2015-09-14 18:55	maite	Triggers an Emergency Pack	=> No
2015-09-14 18:55	maite	Issue Monitored: networkb
2016-02-17 18:04	markmm82	Status	new => scheduled
2016-02-17 18:04	markmm82	Assigned To	Triage Finance => markmm82
2016-02-21 16:49	markmm82	Note Added: 0084382
2016-02-21 16:49	markmm82	Assigned To	markmm82 => maite
2016-02-21 16:49	markmm82	Status	scheduled => feedback
2019-11-07 14:33	markmm82	Note Edited: 0084382	View Revisions

Relationships [ Relation Graph ] [ Dependency Graph ]