Project:
| View Issue Details[ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||||
| ID | |||||||||||
| 0000303 | |||||||||||
| Type | Category | Severity | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||||
| feature request | [Openbravo ERP] 05. Production management | minor | have not tried | 2008-05-14 20:11 | 2011-02-04 09:15 | ||||||
| Reporter | plujan | View Status | public | ||||||||
| Assigned To | rmorley | ||||||||||
| Priority | normal | Resolution | open | Fixed in Version | |||||||
| Status | acknowledged | Fix in branch | Fixed in SCM revision | ||||||||
| Projection | none | ETA | none | Target Version | |||||||
| OS | Windows | Database | PostgreSQL | Java version | don't know | ||||||
| OS Version | XPsp2 | Database version | 8.2.7 | Ant version | don't know | ||||||
| Product Version | 2.35 | SCM revision | mp4 Community | ||||||||
| Review Assigned To | |||||||||||
| Web browser | |||||||||||
| Modules | Core | ||||||||||
| Regression level | |||||||||||
| Regression date | |||||||||||
| Regression introduced in release | |||||||||||
| Regression introduced by commit | |||||||||||
| Triggers an Emergency Pack | No | ||||||||||
| Summary | 0000303: Terminology: Inconsistent use of Business Partner, Employee and Operator | ||||||||||
| Description | When I am creating a Work Effort, I have a Tab called Employee. Inside, I have a selector labeled Business Partner. Do this selector contains Employees or Business Partners? None, it contains Operators. What are Operators? Business Partners whom in Employee tab have checked the Operator flag. See attach. Proposed solution: Terminology should not reflect database design but stick to "reality" as much as possible. If I have to select a specific Employee, which a specific Business Partner, it should not be confusing to an user in order to get in that field just data he/she needs. | ||||||||||
| Steps To Reproduce | Go Production Management > Transactions > Work Effort > Employee | ||||||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||||
| Attached Files |  BUG_TerminologyMisuse.JPG [^] (90,653 bytes) 2008-05-14 20:11
| ||||||||||
 Relationships [ Relation Graph ]
[ Dependency Graph ]
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
 Relationships |
|
Notes |
|
| There are no notes attached to this issue. |
|
Notes |
|
Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 2008-05-14 20:11 | plujan | New Issue | |
| 2008-05-14 20:11 | plujan | Assigned To | => pjuvara |
| 2008-05-14 20:11 | plujan | File Added: BUG_TerminologyMisuse.JPG | |
| 2008-05-14 20:21 | pjuvara | Status | new => acknowledged |
| 2008-05-14 20:22 | pjuvara | Tag Attached: ReleaseCandidate | |
| 2008-05-30 19:59 | pjuvara | Tag Detached: ReleaseCandidate | |
| 2008-05-30 19:59 | pjuvara | Relationship added | blocks 0000504 |
| 2008-11-15 13:24 | pjuvara | Summary | Inconsistent use of Business Partner, Employee and Operator => Terminology: Inconsistent use of Business Partner, Employee and Operator |
| 2008-12-02 13:01 | jaimetorre | sf_bug_id | 0 => 2377020 |
| 2011-02-04 09:15 | jpabloae | Assigned To | pjuvara => rmorley |
|
Issue History |
| Copyright © 2000 - 2009 MantisBT Group |
 |