Project:
| View Issue Details[ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | |||||||
| ID | ||||||||
| 0028553 | ||||||||
| Type | Category | Severity | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Last Update | |||
| defect | [Localization Pack: Spain] AEAT 340 | major | always | 2015-01-09 14:17 | 2015-02-26 12:30 | |||
| Reporter | maite | View Status | public | |||||
| Assigned To | vmromanos | |||||||
| Priority | urgent | Resolution | invalid | Fixed in Version | ||||
| Status | closed | Fix in branch | Fixed in SCM revision | |||||
| Projection | none | ETA | none | Target Version | ||||
| OS | Any | Database | Any | Java version | ||||
| OS Version | Database version | Ant version | ||||||
| Product Version | SCM revision | |||||||
| Regression date | ||||||||
| Regression introduced by commit | ||||||||
| Regression level | ||||||||
| Review Assigned To | vmromanos | |||||||
| Regression introduced in release | ||||||||
| Summary | 0028553: ISO Country Code is taken from Business Partner's Location instead of directly from Business Partner's Tax ID defined, using NOI | |||||||
| Description | In some cases, location defined for a business partner could not be in same country as business partner's tax id defined. In that cases, business patner's tax id should be proper information instead of business partner's location country. We should directly take information from Business Partner TAX ID field instead of from location's information, previously ensuring that NOI format is correct (in the same way that we validate NIF information) | |||||||
| Steps To Reproduce | 1. Define your BP as NOI and tax id= SI11111111 (which corresponds to Eslovenia) 2. Define Location for that BP in France 3. Register Sales Invoice for that business partner 4. Configure and execute Invoice Register Book having that invoice into account 5. Run "Modelo 340" based on previous book and realize that identifier set for your bp is FR11111111 (instead of SI11111111) | |||||||
| Proposed Solution | Develop a module similar to NIF Validator module but for NOI identification | |||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | |||||||
| Attached Files | ||||||||
 Relationships [ Relation Graph ]
[ Dependency Graph ]
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
 Relationships |
|
Notes |
|
|
(0074319) vmromanos (manager) 2015-02-10 11:28 |
The Tax ID field in Business Partner window should be filled with the tax id, not with the NOI, so this is issue is being rejected. However, we think it could make sense to define a new separate field to fill the NOI, and take it into account in the reports where the NOI is used. Besides, a NOI validation could be applied to this field too. Reported as a feature request 0028904 |
|
Notes |
|
Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 2015-01-09 14:17 | maite | New Issue | |
| 2015-01-09 14:17 | maite | Assigned To | => vmromanos |
| 2015-01-12 14:46 | jonalegriaesarte | Regression date | => 2015-02-09 |
| 2015-01-12 14:47 | jonalegriaesarte | Regression date | 2015-02-09 => |
| 2015-01-12 14:47 | jonalegriaesarte | Resolution time | => 1423436400 |
| 2015-02-10 11:28 | vmromanos | Note Added: 0074319 | |
| 2015-02-10 11:29 | vmromanos | Relationship added | related to 0028904 |
| 2015-02-26 12:30 | vmromanos | Review Assigned To | => vmromanos |
| 2015-02-26 12:30 | vmromanos | Status | new => closed |
| 2015-02-26 12:30 | vmromanos | Resolution | open => invalid |
|
Issue History |
| Copyright © 2000 - 2009 MantisBT Group |
 |