Anonymous | Login
Project:
RSS
  
News | My View | View Issues | Roadmap | Summary

View Revisions: Issue #27963 All Revisions ] Back to Issue ]
Summary 0027963: Differences between estimated landed cost and invoiced landed cost handle as unit cost
Revision 2014-10-23 13:20 by psanjuan
Steps To Reproduce Create a product named "Landed Cost Test 4".
Go to price tab and enter a unit/list price = 250.00

Go to Goods Receipt and create a new one dated on 23/10/2014. Select the product and enter 1 unit. Complete.

Run the costing background process and go back to the receipt and post it.

Realize that value posted in product asset account is 250.00.

Go to product window, search the product and verify that the costing and the transaction value = 250.00

Go to landed cost window and create a new one dated on 27/10/2014
Go to Cost tab and select an account type landed cost, i.e duties
Enter an amount of 5.00
Go to receipt tab and select the receipt just created.

Process the landed cost and post it.

Posting would look like
Debit: 5.00 (product asset account)
Credit: 5.00 (expense account)

Go to purchase invoice and enter a new one dated on 30/05/2014.
Go to lines and select the account G/L item of the landed cost type (i.e. duties)
Enter an amount of 2.00
Complete and post the invoice.

Press the button Match LC Cost and select the landed cost created. Enter an amount matched of 2.00 and select the check Is matching adjusted. Select as well the check Process Matching.

Once done realize that a new costing adjustment has been created for an amount of -3 (this is correct).

What it is not correct is that this cost adjustment is flagged as Unit Cost = Yes. It should be as Unit Cost =No

Go back to landed cost window and post the matching
Posting looks like:
Debit: 5.00 (expense account)
Credit: 3.00 (product asset)
Credit: 2.00 (expense account)

Above posting is correct as leads to a product asset value of 250+5-3=252

Go to Product window and search the product. Go to Transaction tab, realize that
Trx Original cost = 250 (this is correct)
Total Cost = 252 (250+5-3) (this is correct)
Unit Cost = 247 (250-3) (this is not correct. It should be 250)

Revision 2014-10-23 13:19 by psanjuan
Steps To Reproduce Create a product named "Landed Cost Test 4".
Go to price tab and enter a unit/list price = 250.00

Go to Goods Receipt and create a new one dated on 23/10/2014. Select the product and enter 1 unit. Complete.

Run the costing background process and go back to the receipt and post it.

Realize that value posted in product asset account is 250.00.

Go to product window, search the product and verify that the costing and the transaction value = 250.00

Go to landed cost window and create a new one dated on 27/10/2014
Go to Cost tab and select an account type landed cost, i.e duties
Enter an amount of 5.00
Go to receipt tab and select the receipt just created.

Process the landed cost and post it.

Posting would look like
Debit: 5.00 (product asset account)
Credit: 5.00 (expense account)

Go to purchase invoice and enter a new one dated on 30/05/2014.
Go to lines and select the account G/L item of the landed cost type (i.e. duties)
Enter an amount of 2.00
Complete and post the invoice.

Press the button Match LC Cost and select the landed cost created. Enter an amount matched of 2.00 and select the check Is matching adjusted. Select as well the check Process Matching.

Once done realize that a new costing adjustment has been created for an amount of -3 (this is correct).

What it is not correct is that this cost adjustment is flagged as Unit Cost = Yes. It should be as Unit Cost =No

Go back to landed cost window and post the matching
Posting looks like:
Debit: 5.00 (expense account)
Credit: 3.00 (product asset)
Credit: 2.00 (expense account)

Above posting is correct as leads to a product asset value of 250+5-3=252

Go to Product window and search the product. Go to Transaction tab, realize that
Trx Original cost = 250 (this is correct)
Total Cost = 252 (250+5-3) (this is correct)
Unit Cost = 247 (250-3) (this is not correct. It should be



Copyright © 2000 - 2009 MantisBT Group
Powered by Mantis Bugtracker