Anonymous | Login
Project:
RSS
  
News | My View | View Issues | Roadmap | Summary

View Issue Details[ Jump to Notes ] [ Issue History ] [ Print ]
ID
0009054
TypeCategorySeverityReproducibilityDate SubmittedLast Update
defect[Openbravo ERP] 01. General setupminorhave not tried2009-05-15 16:482009-07-21 00:00
ReportermtaalView Statuspublic 
Assigned Torafaroda 
PriorityurgentResolutionduplicateFixed in Version
StatusclosedFix in branchFixed in SCM revision
ProjectionnoneETAnoneTarget Versionpi
OSAnyDatabaseAnyJava version
OS VersionDatabase versionAnt version
Product VersionpiSCM revision 
Review Assigned To
Web browser
ModulesCore
Regression level
Regression date
Regression introduced in release
Regression introduced by commit
Triggers an Emergency PackNo
Summary

0009054: Common: Default value in database and application dictionary differ, they need to be the same

DescriptionColumn OrderLine.Ordered Quantity: the Application Dictionary and the database have differing default values, AD: 1 DB: 0
Column InvoiceLine.Invoiced Quantity: the Application Dictionary and the database have differing default values, AD: 1 DB: 0
Column Bank.Own Bank: the Application Dictionary and the database have differing default values, AD: Y DB: N
Steps To ReproduceColumn OrderLine.Ordered Quantity: the Application Dictionary and the database have differing default values, AD: 1 DB: 0. Default value for both 1
Column InvoiceLine.Invoiced Quantity: the Application Dictionary and the database have differing default values, AD: 1 DB: 0. Default value for both 1
Column Bank.Own Bank: the Application Dictionary and the database have differing default values, AD: Y DB: N. Default value for both Y


Tags250mp2
Attached Files

- Relationships [ Relation Graph ] [ Dependency Graph ]
duplicate of feature request 0009968 newiciordia Support default values in AD fields 
blocks defect 0008900pi closedmtaal Inconsistencies between database default values and application dictionary default values 

-  Notes
(0016399)
mtaal (manager)
2009-05-15 19:11

 Hi Rafa,
This is the same as for the other issues. Someone knowledgeable in the common functional areas needs to take on this one imo.

gr. Martin
(0018430)
rafaroda (developer)
2009-07-20 16:12

 This issue will be addressed by feature request 0009968

- Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
2009-05-15 16:48 mtaal New Issue
2009-05-15 16:48 mtaal Assigned To => rafaroda
2009-05-15 16:48 mtaal Regression testing => No
2009-05-15 16:53 mtaal Relationship added related to 0008900
2009-05-15 16:56 mtaal Relationship replaced blocks 0008900
2009-05-15 16:58 mtaal Tag Attached: 250mp2
2009-05-15 16:58 mtaal Priority normal => urgent
2009-05-15 18:05 rafaroda Status new => scheduled
2009-05-15 18:06 rafaroda Assigned To rafaroda => mtaal
2009-05-15 19:11 mtaal Note Added: 0016399
2009-05-15 19:11 mtaal Assigned To mtaal => rafaroda
2009-07-17 12:25 psarobe Proposed Solution updated
2009-07-17 14:08 psarobe Description Updated
2009-07-17 14:08 psarobe Proposed Solution updated
2009-07-17 14:11 rafaroda Proposed Solution updated
2009-07-20 16:12 rafaroda Relationship added duplicate of 0009968
2009-07-20 16:12 rafaroda Status scheduled => closed
2009-07-20 16:12 rafaroda Note Added: 0018430
2009-07-20 16:12 rafaroda Duplicate ID 0 => 9968
2009-07-20 16:12 rafaroda Resolution open => duplicate
2009-07-21 00:00 anonymous sf_bug_id 0 => 2824524
2016-01-04 18:14 shuehner Relationship added blocks 0031817

Copyright © 2000 - 2009 MantisBT Group
Powered by Mantis Bugtracker