Project:
| View Issue Details[ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | |||||||||||
| ID | ||||||||||||
| 0056941 | ||||||||||||
| Type | Category | Severity | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Last Update | |||||||
| defect | [Retail Modules] Web POS | trivial | always | 2024-10-30 18:17 | 2025-01-30 14:56 | |||||||
| Reporter | sofidossant | View Status | public | |||||||||
| Assigned To | jorgewederago | |||||||||||
| Priority | normal | Resolution | open | Fixed in Version | ||||||||
| Status | new | Fix in branch | Fixed in SCM revision | |||||||||
| Projection | none | ETA | none | Target Version | ||||||||
| OS | Any | Database | Any | Java version | ||||||||
| OS Version | Database version | Ant version | ||||||||||
| Product Version | pi | SCM revision | ||||||||||
| Merge Request Status | ||||||||||||
| Review Assigned To | ||||||||||||
| OBNetwork customer | OBPS | |||||||||||
| Support ticket | 112785 | |||||||||||
| Regression level | ||||||||||||
| Regression date | ||||||||||||
| Regression introduced in release | ||||||||||||
| Regression introduced by commit | ||||||||||||
| Triggers an Emergency Pack | No | |||||||||||
| Summary | 0056941: Use of characteristic in the POS | |||||||||||
| Description | If we remove the usage check "use in webpos", the field check "Filter in webpos" disappears, but the check continue in yes. | |||||||||||
| Steps To Reproduce | 1 - Remove the usage check "use in webpos", the field check "Filter in webpos" disappears, but the check remains. | |||||||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | |||||||||||
| Attached Files |  Videograbación 2024-10-30 14:11:10.mp4 [^] (1,185,880 bytes) 2024-10-30 18:17 | |||||||||||
 Relationships [ Relation Graph ]
[ Dependency Graph ]
|
|
 Relationships |
|
Notes |
|
|
(0171180) guillermogil (viewer) 2024-10-31 05:31 |
Hi, is this just affecting the backoffice on that "use on WebPOS" = N and "Filter in POS" = Y is doing something on the POS? It is a different issue if this is Filtering on POS in case Use in WebPOS = N or just backoffice |
|
(0171211) sofidossant (viewer) 2024-10-31 12:33 |
No, it just doesn't make sense for the field to be set to yes if it is not going to be used. |
|
(0171216) guillermogil (viewer) 2024-10-31 12:47 |
Decreased severity as it is not affecting any functionality in the POS just the checkboxes on the backoffice |
|
Notes |
|
Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 2024-10-30 18:17 | sofidossant | New Issue | |
| 2024-10-30 18:17 | sofidossant | Assigned To | => Retail |
| 2024-10-30 18:17 | sofidossant | File Added: Videograbación 2024-10-30 14:11:10.mp4 | |
| 2024-10-30 18:17 | sofidossant | OBNetwork customer | => OBPS |
| 2024-10-30 18:17 | sofidossant | Support ticket | => 112785 |
| 2024-10-30 18:17 | sofidossant | Triggers an Emergency Pack | => No |
| 2024-10-31 05:31 | guillermogil | Note Added: 0171180 | |
| 2024-10-31 05:32 | guillermogil | Assigned To | Retail => sdossantos |
| 2024-10-31 05:32 | guillermogil | Status | new => feedback |
| 2024-10-31 12:33 | sofidossant | Note Added: 0171211 | |
| 2024-10-31 12:33 | sofidossant | Status | feedback => new |
| 2024-10-31 12:47 | guillermogil | Note Added: 0171216 | |
| 2024-10-31 12:47 | guillermogil | Assigned To | sdossantos => Retail |
| 2024-10-31 12:47 | guillermogil | Severity | minor => trivial |
| 2025-01-30 14:56 | guillermogil | Assigned To | Retail => jorgewederago |
|
Issue History |
| Copyright © 2000 - 2009 MantisBT Group |
 |