Anonymous | Login
Project:
RSS
  
News | My View | View Issues | Roadmap | Summary

View Issue DetailsJump to Notes ] Issue History ] Print ]
ID
0033653
TypeCategorySeverityReproducibilityDate SubmittedLast Update
design defect[Openbravo ERP] A. Platformminoralways2016-08-08 14:472022-02-01 08:09
ReporterVictorVillarView Statuspublic 
Assigned ToTriage Platform Base 
PriorityurgentResolutionopenFixed in Version
StatusacknowledgedFix in branchFixed in SCM revision
ProjectionnoneETAnoneTarget Version
OSAnyDatabaseAnyJava version
OS VersionDatabase versionAnt version
Product VersionSCM revision 
Review Assigned To
Web browser
ModulesCore
Regression level
Regression date
Regression introduced in release
Regression introduced by commit
Triggers an Emergency PackNo
Summary

0033653: [SER QA 1248] Not visible the name of the property in the Preference tab section

DescriptionNot visible the name of the property in the Preference tab section when you select a preference (type list).
Now what you see is the identifier.
Steps To ReproduceGo to Preference window:
 select a preference (type list). In the tab section (above) you see the identifier. It should be the name of the property

TagsSER-QA
Attached Filesdiff file icon issue33653.diff [^] (3,993 bytes) 2016-08-30 08:42 [Show Content]

- Relationships Relation Graph ] Dependency Graph ]
has duplicate defect 0041331 closedplatform Preference Search Key is showing instead of preference name 

-  Notes
(0089525)
caristu (developer)
2016-08-30 08:47
edited on: 2016-08-30 08:50

Moved to design defect. Attached a temporal patch which solves the problem in the tab title. But it has several drawbacks:

- Adding overhead to retrieve the type of reference. This could be avoided by adding this information into the model, in order to have it already loaded in memory.

- More overhead to retrieve the translation.

- The patch is not complete: when sorting, the search key is still taken into account as it is the value being stored in the table.

- It seems to be transparent when filtering, but more testing would be required to confirm it.


- Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
2016-08-08 14:47 VictorVillar New Issue
2016-08-08 14:47 VictorVillar Assigned To => caristu
2016-08-08 14:47 VictorVillar File Added: 6264.png
2016-08-08 14:47 VictorVillar Modules => Core
2016-08-08 14:47 VictorVillar Resolution time => 1471816800
2016-08-08 14:47 VictorVillar Triggers an Emergency Pack => No
2016-08-08 14:50 VictorVillar Tag Attached: SER-QA
2016-08-10 13:31 VictorVillar Description Updated View Revisions
2016-08-10 13:31 VictorVillar Steps to Reproduce Updated View Revisions
2016-08-30 08:42 caristu File Added: issue33653.diff
2016-08-30 08:43 caristu File Deleted: 6264.png
2016-08-30 08:44 caristu Type defect => design defect
2016-08-30 08:47 caristu Note Added: 0089525
2016-08-30 08:47 caristu Note View State: private: 89525
2016-08-30 08:48 caristu Note View State: public: 89525
2016-08-30 08:49 caristu Note Edited: 0089525 View Revisions
2016-08-30 08:50 caristu Note Edited: 0089525 View Revisions
2016-08-30 12:14 alostale Resolution time 1471816800 =>
2016-08-30 12:14 alostale Status new => acknowledged
2016-09-16 14:50 caristu Assigned To caristu => platform
2019-07-12 11:14 asiermartirena Relationship added has duplicate 0041331
2022-02-01 08:09 alostale Assigned To platform => Triage Platform Base


Copyright © 2000 - 2009 MantisBT Group
Powered by Mantis Bugtracker