Project:
| View Issue Details[ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | |||||||
| ID | ||||||||
| 0016353 | ||||||||
| Type | Category | Severity | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Last Update | |||
| defect | [Openbravo ERP] A. Platform | major | always | 2011-03-17 11:44 | 2011-04-01 00:00 | |||
| Reporter | alostale | View Status | public | |||||
| Assigned To | alostale | |||||||
| Priority | urgent | Resolution | no change required | Fixed in Version | ||||
| Status | closed | Fix in branch | Fixed in SCM revision | |||||
| Projection | none | ETA | none | Target Version | 3.0RC6 | |||
| OS | Any | Database | Any | Java version | ||||
| OS Version | Database version | Ant version | ||||||
| Product Version | pi | SCM revision | ||||||
| Merge Request Status | ||||||||
| Review Assigned To | ||||||||
| OBNetwork customer | No | |||||||
| Web browser | ||||||||
| Modules | Core | |||||||
| Support ticket | ||||||||
| Regression level | ||||||||
| Regression date | ||||||||
| Regression introduced in release | ||||||||
| Regression introduced by commit | ||||||||
| Triggers an Emergency Pack | No | |||||||
| Summary | 0016353: Additional _R field is not present in 3.0 getContextInfo | |||||||
| Description | Selectors in WAD windows generate two fields, one for the value and another one (called than the former one appending _R) for the displayed value. This last one is not passed as parameter to process in 3.0 windows. | |||||||
| Steps To Reproduce | See 0016342 | |||||||
| Proposed Solution | Add to UI definition a boolean to include this additional field and make use of this in the getContextInfo js before calling the processes. | |||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | |||||||
| Attached Files | ||||||||
 Relationships [ Relation Graph ]
[ Dependency Graph ]
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
 Relationships |
|
Notes |
|
|
(0035389) alostale (viewer) 2011-03-31 09:35 |
Not to be fixed. This change would require modification not only in UI definition but also in the View Component. It is a change affecting all windows to solve a really unlikely case. It has been documented in the migration guide [1], the change done for 0016342 is the proposed solution. [1] http://wiki.openbravo.com/wiki/ERP/2.50/Developers_Guide/Concepts/How_to_Migrate_2.50_Modules_to_3.0_Advanced [^] |
|
Notes |
|
Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 2011-03-17 11:44 | alostale | New Issue | |
| 2011-03-17 11:44 | alostale | Assigned To | => alostale |
| 2011-03-17 11:44 | alostale | Modules | => Core |
| 2011-03-17 11:44 | alostale | OBNetwork customer | => No |
| 2011-03-17 11:44 | alostale | Relationship added | has duplicate 0016342 |
| 2011-03-17 11:46 | alostale | Steps to Reproduce Updated | View Revisions |
| 2011-03-17 11:46 | alostale | Relationship deleted | has duplicate 0016342 |
| 2011-03-17 11:46 | alostale | Relationship added | related to 0016342 |
| 2011-03-21 09:58 | alostale | Status | new => scheduled |
| 2011-03-31 09:17 | alostale | Description Updated | View Revisions |
| 2011-03-31 09:35 | alostale | Note Added: 0035389 | |
| 2011-03-31 09:35 | alostale | Status | scheduled => closed |
| 2011-03-31 09:35 | alostale | Resolution | open => no change required |
| 2011-04-01 00:00 | anonymous | sf_bug_id | 0 => 3265627 |
|
Issue History |
| Copyright © 2000 - 2009 MantisBT Group |
 |