Openbravo Issue Tracking System - Openbravo ERP
View Issue Details
0008459Openbravo ERP07. Sales managementpublic2009-04-06 14:082009-04-29 00:00
sureshbabu 
AinhoaPagola 
urgentmajoralways
closedno change required 
30
2.50 
 
Core
No
0008459: Not able to submit a Sales order with document type as Warehouse and a product associated with an attribute set.
Not able to submit a Sales order with document type as Warehouse with a product associated with an attribute set.

Note: able to complete the order with document type as warehouse with a product which is not associated with an attribute set.(Hammer)
step 1: Move to sales order
Sales Management || Transactions || Sales Order || Header
step 2: Select any customer
step 3: select document type as warehouse
step 4: move to lines tab and click new.
step 5: select any product with is associated with an attribute set.(example paint)
step 6: move to header & try to complete the order by clicking the complete button

Actual result: System throws error message as "Error: no data found"





250 final review, 250MP1
related to defect 0008472 closed AinhoaPagola User not able to create goods shipment using Generate Shipments process when SO Product is associated with an attribute. 
jpg Not able to submit a Sales order with product associated with an attribute and Document type is Warehouse.JPG (206,617) 2009-04-06 14:08
https://issues.openbravo.com/file_download.php?file_id=1135&type=bug
jpg
Issue History
2009-04-06 14:08sureshbabuNew Issue
2009-04-06 14:08sureshbabuAssigned To => rafaroda
2009-04-06 14:08sureshbabuFile Added: Not able to submit a Sales order with product associated with an attribute and Document type is Warehouse.JPG
2009-04-06 14:08sureshbabuRegression testing => No
2009-04-06 14:53sureshbabuTag Attached: 250 final review
2009-04-22 17:23psarobeAssigned Torafaroda => gorkaion
2009-04-22 17:23psarobePriorityhigh => urgent
2009-04-22 17:23psarobeStatusnew => scheduled
2009-04-22 17:23psarobeversion2.50beta => 2.50
2009-04-22 17:32psarobeRelationship addedrelated to 0008472
2009-04-23 16:04psarobeTag Attached: 250MP1
2009-04-27 17:18AinhoaPagolaAssigned Togorkaion => AinhoaPagola
2009-04-27 18:45AinhoaPagolaStatusscheduled => resolved
2009-04-27 18:45AinhoaPagolaFixed in SCM revision => 5f72980f59c8
2009-04-27 18:45AinhoaPagolaResolutionopen => fixed
2009-04-27 18:46AinhoaPagolaNote Added: 0015816
2009-04-27 19:08AinhoaPagolaStatusresolved => new
2009-04-27 19:08AinhoaPagolaResolutionfixed => open
2009-04-27 19:09AinhoaPagolaStatusnew => scheduled
2009-04-27 19:09AinhoaPagolaFixed in SCM revision5f72980f59c8 =>
2009-04-27 19:09AinhoaPagolaNote Deleted: 0015816
2009-04-27 19:10AinhoaPagolaNote Added: 0015819
2009-04-27 19:10AinhoaPagolaStatusscheduled => feedback
2009-04-28 11:29plujanStatusfeedback => closed
2009-04-28 11:29plujanResolutionopen => no change required
2009-04-29 00:00anonymoussf_bug_id0 => 2783260

Notes
(0015819)
AinhoaPagola   
2009-04-27 19:10   
I have tested this bug in pi, Oracle and PostgreSQL and seems to work fine. Could you check if it is still reproducible?