Openbravo Issue Tracking System - Openbravo ERP |
| View Issue Details |
|
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
| 0006847 | Openbravo ERP | 00. Application dictionary | public | 2009-01-12 14:05 | 2009-04-21 12:36 |
|
| Reporter | iciordia | |
| Assigned To | mtaal | |
| Priority | high | Severity | major | Reproducibility | always |
| Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | |
| Platform | | OS | 5 | OS Version | any |
| Product Version | pi | |
| Target Version | | Fixed in Version | | |
| Merge Request Status | |
| Review Assigned To | |
| OBNetwork customer | No |
| Web browser | |
| Modules | Core |
| Support ticket | |
| Regression level | |
| Regression date | |
| Regression introduced in release | |
| Regression introduced by commit | |
| Triggers an Emergency Pack | No |
|
| Summary | 0006847: ad_table.classname should be mandatory and a validation should be added to avoid clashes in ad_table.name |
| Description | There are around 50 tables with classname set to null. Additionally, a validation should be added to avoid clashes in ad_table.name from different modules (force to use db_prefix?) |
| Steps To Reproduce | |
| Proposed Solution | |
| Additional Information | |
| Tags | No tags attached. |
| Relationships | | has duplicate | defect | 0006842 | | closed | mtaal | Entity Names of new tables in a module should be prefixed |
|
| Attached Files | |
|
| Issue History |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 2009-01-12 14:05 | iciordia | New Issue | |
| 2009-01-12 14:05 | iciordia | Assigned To | => mtaal |
| 2009-01-12 14:05 | iciordia | sf_bug_id | 0 => 2501307 |
| 2009-01-12 14:05 | iciordia | OBNetwork customer | => No |
| 2009-01-12 14:05 | iciordia | Regression testing | => No |
| 2009-01-12 14:23 | mtaal | Note Added: 0012111 | |
| 2009-01-12 20:20 | iciordia | Note Added: 0012130 | |
| 2009-01-12 20:42 | mtaal | Note Added: 0012132 | |
| 2009-01-13 15:31 | mtaal | Note Added: 0012148 | |
| 2009-01-13 21:46 | mtaal | Note Added: 0012161 | |
| 2009-01-13 21:58 | mtaal | Relationship added | has duplicate 0006842 |
| 2009-01-15 16:04 | svnbot | Checkin | |
| 2009-01-15 16:04 | svnbot | Note Added: 0012221 | |
| 2009-01-15 16:04 | svnbot | Status | new => resolved |
| 2009-01-15 16:04 | svnbot | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2009-01-15 16:04 | svnbot | svn_revision | => 11937 |
| 2009-04-21 12:36 | psarobe | Status | resolved => closed |
|
Notes |
|
|
(0012111)
|
|
mtaal
|
|
2009-01-12 14:23
|
|
Hi Ismael,
Regarding classname, I think for classname we don't need to add dbprefix. The combination of classname and package should be unique (the ad_package.javaname is already unique). So this would be an additional constraint next to classname not null.
For the entityname (used in xml and such) there is no class/package name so there we can use the dbprefix.
Let me know what you think.
gr. Martin |
|
|
|
(0012130)
|
|
iciordia
|
|
2009-01-12 20:20
|
|
Hi Martin,
if you review the bug description I did I was reporting two bugs:
-classname should be mandatory
-name (entityName) should be unique across modules
So we are in synch ;-)
Additionally it is needed to review current values for EntityNames (name) because there is no rule to define this name (some times DB_Prefix is used, some times not, etc.)
Ismael |
|
|
|
(0012132)
|
|
mtaal
|
|
2009-01-12 20:42
|
|
Some additional points:
- check current ad_table.name for incorrect values
- write to developers list about correct use of name, tablename and classname fields and relation to ad_package |
|
|
|
(0012148)
|
|
mtaal
|
|
2009-01-13 15:31
|
|
The following changes have been made:
- checked and corrected ad_table.name
- set ad_table.classname for the ones which were null
- updated referencedata
- various changes in the code to follow the changes in the generated entities
Changes have been tested by a successfull ant install.source
To be done:
- add trigger to check for prefix of module in ad_table.name
- further update of package of ad_table records on the basis of reaction of Ismael |
|
|
|
(0012161)
|
|
mtaal
|
|
2009-01-13 21:46
|
|
Done:
- The trigger was already defined, so no extra validation required.
- An email has been sent to the developers list about the use of AD_Table.classname, name and ad_package_id
Open topic:
- Waiting for reaction of Ismael on packaging of several tables
Work on this issue continues after this info has been received. |
|
|
|
(0012221)
|
|
svnbot
|
|
2009-01-15 16:04
|
|
Repository: openbravo
Revision: 11937
Author: mtaal
Date: 2009-01-15 16:03:45 +0100 (Thu, 15 Jan 2009)
Fixes issue 6847, assigned several tables from core package to more meaningfull package, removed core package, removed T_Report table, changed names of several tables
---
U trunk/referencedata/sampledata/Accounting_Test.xml
U trunk/referencedata/sampledata/BigBazaar.xml
U trunk/src-db/database/sourcedata/AD_FIELD.xml
U trunk/src-db/database/sourcedata/AD_PACKAGE.xml
U trunk/src-db/database/sourcedata/AD_TABLE.xml
---
https://dev.openbravo.com/websvn/openbravo/?rev=11937&sc=1 [^]
|
|