Openbravo Issue Tracking System - Openbravo ERP
View Issue Details
0006755Openbravo ERP09. Financial managementpublic2008-12-29 22:042009-02-19 17:40
vmromanos 
vmromanos 
normalmajoralways
closedno change required 
20Ubuntu 8.04
pi 
 
Core
No
0006755: Unable to post a manual settlement
When you try to post a manual settlement, the application will return the following error:

"ProcessRunError\nCreated=0"
1- Go to Financial Management || Receivables & Payables || Transactions || Manual Settlement || Manual Settlement
2- Create a new settlement and save it
3- Go to Create Payment tab, create a new record and save it. Example:
   Business Partner: Bellen
   Amount: 10
   Project: riley
4- Go to Balance Payment tab, create a new record and save it. Example:
   Credit amount: 10
5- Go to Manual Settlement tab again and process it.
6- Finally, try to post it. The error will appear.
No tags attached.
blocks defect 0006712 closed eduardo_Argal Project is not included in fact_acct when a bank statement is posted 
Issue History
2008-12-29 22:04vmromanosNew Issue
2008-12-29 22:04vmromanosAssigned To => rafaroda
2008-12-29 22:04vmromanossf_bug_id0 => 2475655
2008-12-29 22:04vmromanosRegression testing => No
2008-12-29 22:06vmromanosRelationship addedblocks 0006712
2008-12-29 22:09vmromanosReproducibilityhave not tried => always
2008-12-31 10:58HennadziAssigned Torafaroda => Hennadzi
2008-12-31 11:12HennadziStatusnew => scheduled
2008-12-31 11:12Hennadzifix_in_branch => trunk
2009-02-18 13:56rafarodaAssigned ToHennadzi => vmromanos
2009-02-18 23:23eduardo_ArgalNote Added: 0013701
2009-02-18 23:23eduardo_ArgalStatusscheduled => feedback
2009-02-19 17:40vmromanosStatusfeedback => closed
2009-02-19 17:40vmromanosNote Added: 0013754
2009-02-19 17:40vmromanosResolutionopen => no change required

Notes
(0013701)
eduardo_Argal   
2009-02-18 23:23   
Is the payment flagged as direct posting??
(0013754)
vmromanos   
2009-02-19 17:40   
For posting a manual settlement it is necessary to check the direct posting flag. So it is not a bug.

Thanks Eduardo for the clarification.