Openbravo Issue Tracking System - Modules | ||||||||||||
View Issue Details | ||||||||||||
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | |||||||
0048320 | Modules | Reporting | public | 2021-12-24 10:22 | 2021-12-25 10:48 | |||||||
Reporter | shuehner | |||||||||||
Assigned To | mtaal | |||||||||||
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried | |||||||
Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | |||||||||
Platform | OS | 5 | OS Version | |||||||||
Product Version | ||||||||||||
Target Version | Fixed in Version | |||||||||||
Merge Request Status | ||||||||||||
Regression date | ||||||||||||
Regression introduced by commit | ||||||||||||
Regression level | ||||||||||||
Review Assigned To | ||||||||||||
Support ticket | ||||||||||||
OBNetwork customer | ||||||||||||
Regression introduced in release | ||||||||||||
Summary | 0048320: Review list of jar files copy to DataLoaderApp as several might not be needed | |||||||||||
Description | 2 separate cases to look into: a.) Issue 48282 required to update library file copying as filenames in backoffice had change yet again. Undocumented change done instead to simplify that going ahead copy by wildcard patterns to no longer hardcode specific filenames (which include the version). However among those the new patterns will suddenly include new files related to ant: https://gitlab.com/openbravo/product/pmods/org.openbravo.reporting.tools/-/commit/9f5d045e8ceb9a86d6aac1c2b77a439a015299c8#bdc348bf75801c527f51cdeddc8edf027f7ef35a_247_169 [^] File list before: - ant-1.9.2.jar File list now: - ant-1.9.2.jar - ant-launcher-1.9.2.jar - ant-nodeps.jar As no other code change was done requiring that + not documented probably accidental regression done in that commit. b.) log4j-slf4j adapter files That file is optional part of log4j to support code using the slf4j logging api but log4j as an implementation. For that to be useful probably also the main slf4j api file would be needed as well (as done in backoffice) slf4j-api-1.7.25.jar Given that it is not copied + no direct slf4j reference seems to be in reporting.tools java code that looks like an unused file and if so should not be copied. | |||||||||||
Steps To Reproduce | - | |||||||||||
Proposed Solution | ||||||||||||
Additional Information | ||||||||||||
Tags | No tags attached. | |||||||||||
Relationships |
| |||||||||||
Attached Files | ||||||||||||
Issue History | ||||||||||||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change | |||||||||
2021-12-24 10:22 | shuehner | New Issue | ||||||||||
2021-12-24 10:22 | shuehner | Assigned To | => mtaal | |||||||||
2021-12-24 10:23 | shuehner | Relationship added | related to 0048319 | |||||||||
2021-12-25 10:42 | hgbot | Resolution | open => fixed | |||||||||
2021-12-25 10:42 | hgbot | Status | new => resolved | |||||||||
2021-12-25 10:42 | hgbot | Note Added: 0133971 | ||||||||||
2021-12-25 10:46 | mtaal | Note Added: 0133972 | ||||||||||
2021-12-25 10:46 | mtaal | Status | resolved => closed | |||||||||
2021-12-25 10:48 | mtaal | Note Added: 0133973 |
Notes | |||||
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|||||
|
|