Openbravo Issue Tracking System - Openbravo ERP
View Issue Details
IDProjectCategoryView StatusDate SubmittedLast Update
0004191Openbravo ERPA. Platformpublic2008-06-27 15:312011-05-17 12:40
Reporterpjuvara 
Assigned Toiciordia 
PrioritylowSeveritymajorReproducibilityhave not tried
StatusclosedResolutionfixed 
PlatformOS5OS Version
Product Version 
Target VersionpiFixed in Version 
Merge Request Status
Review Assigned To
OBNetwork customer
Web browser
ModulesCore
Support ticket
Regression level
Regression date
Regression introduced in release
Regression introduced by commit
Triggers an Emergency PackNo
Summary0004191: Selector UI patter in Application Dictionary
DescriptionOne of the major value propositions of Openbravo is the Model Driven Development: you do not need to code your application but you can simply declare it in your model.
However, many commonly used UIs, currently require custom code.
Selectors are one of them.
The purpose of this project is to support this class of UIs in the Application Dictionary and to replace the existing custom code implementation.
Steps To Reproduce
Proposed Solution
Additional Information
Tagsdev-platform-big-wins, ReleaseCandidate
Relationships
related to feature request 0003379pi closed rgoris LiveSearch on selectors 
depends on feature request 0004124 closed rgoris Selecting an item within a selector 
depends on feature request 0003375 closed rgoris Cancelling a selector blanks the field 
related to feature request 0003367 closed rmorley Size of Boxes in Pop - Up Windows 
related to feature request 0005051 closed mtaal DAL Iteration 3: transparent translation, implement service, UI Selector 
related to defect 0005048 closed gorkaion Option to apply filtering to a searcher 
related to feature request 0007343 acknowledged iciordia Add validation feature to Selectors (as we already have for combo-boxes) 
Attached Files
Issue History
Date ModifiedUsernameFieldChange
2008-06-27 15:31pjuvaraNew Issue
2008-06-27 15:31pjuvaraAssigned To => cromero
2008-06-27 15:31pjuvarasf_bug_id0 => 2004137
2008-06-27 15:32pjuvaraStatusnew => scheduled
2008-06-27 15:32pjuvaraTag Attached: ReleaseCandidate
2008-06-27 15:32pjuvaraRelationship addedrelated to 0003379
2008-06-27 15:34pjuvaraRelationship addeddepends on 0004124
2008-06-27 16:14pjuvaraRelationship addeddepends on 0003375
2008-07-01 19:39pjuvaraRelationship addedrelated to 0003367
2008-09-15 13:11mtaalRelationship addedrelated to 0005051
2008-09-30 12:35shuehnerRelationship addedrelated to 0005048
2008-11-03 13:43pjuvaraTarget Version2.50 => 2.60
2008-11-10 13:09cromeroAssigned Tocromero => pjuvara
2008-11-21 16:45pjuvaraStatusscheduled => acknowledged
2008-11-21 17:05pjuvaraTarget Version2.60 => trunk
2009-02-03 15:12shuehnerRelationship addedrelated to 0007343
2009-05-22 19:34pjuvaraAssigned Topjuvara => iciordia
2010-11-02 16:57rafarodaTag Attached: dev-platform-big-wins
2011-05-17 12:40rgorisStatusacknowledged => scheduled
2011-05-17 12:40rgorisfix_in_branch => pi
2011-05-17 12:40rgorisStatusscheduled => resolved
2011-05-17 12:40rgorisFixed in SCM revision => 3
2011-05-17 12:40rgorisResolutionopen => fixed
2011-05-17 12:40rgorisStatusresolved => closed

There are no notes attached to this issue.