Openbravo Issue Tracking System - Retail Modules
View Issue Details
0036249Retail ModulesWeb POSpublic2017-06-14 08:092017-11-20 12:55
pradeepvarma 
maite 
highmajoralways
feedbackopen 
5
 
 
No
0036249: Tax structure behaving differently on POS and ERP
When we created a parent tax rate under which 3 child tax rates are there and associate with a product.

When crating manually the sales order with that product its picking all child tax rates where as in POS we are adding this product its picking the child tax rate which is belonging to that region.So behaviour is different.
Create
GST 5% -- Parent (this has from and to country as India)
CGST - 3% - Under GST 5% (this has from and to country as India)
SGST 2% - Under GST 5% (this has from and to country as India and from and to region as KA)
SGST 2.5% - Under GST 5% (this has from and to country as India and from and to region as MH)

Then bill a product in web pos(for a terminal in KA region) it is picking up following tax structure
GST 5% -- Parent (this has from and to country as India)
CGST - 3% - Under GST 5% (this has from and to country as India)
SGST 2% - Under GST 5% (this has from and to country as India and from and to region as KA)

Now create a manual SO in the erp(for KA region) the complete set is getting picked, which is
GST 5% -- Parent (this has from and to country as India)
CGST - 3% - Under GST 5% (this has from and to country as India)
SGST 2% - Under GST 5% (this has from and to country as India and from and to region as KA)
SGST 2.5% - Under GST 5% (this has from and to country as India and from and to region as MH)
No tags attached.
Issue History
2017-06-14 08:09pradeepvarmaNew Issue
2017-06-14 08:09pradeepvarmaAssigned To => Retail
2017-06-14 08:09pradeepvarmaResolution time => 1499205600
2017-06-14 08:09pradeepvarmaTriggers an Emergency Pack => No
2017-06-15 21:47rqueraltaAssigned ToRetail => rqueralta
2017-06-16 12:15marvintmTarget VersionRR16Q3.5 =>
2017-06-16 12:15marvintmSteps to Reproduce Updatedbug_revision_view_page.php?rev_id=15375#r15375
2017-06-29 13:49maiteIssue Monitored: networkb
2017-06-29 16:14marvintmNote Added: 0097778
2017-06-29 16:14marvintmAssigned Torqueralta => pradeepvarma
2017-06-29 16:14marvintmStatusnew => feedback
2017-06-29 16:21rqueraltaAssigned Topradeepvarma =>
2017-07-03 08:43marvintmAssigned To => pradeepvarma
2017-08-25 11:16psanjuanNote Added: 0098649
2017-11-06 14:44maiteAssigned Topradeepvarma => maite
2017-11-20 12:55maiteResolution time1499205600 =>

Notes
(0097778)
marvintm   
2017-06-29 16:14   
After further discussion, we need to clarify exactly what was the purpose of the intended configuration, and what behavior was expected. Maite has the details of this and will come back to you.
(0098649)
psanjuan   
2017-08-25 11:16   
email sent to Promantia to better understand business scenario behind so we can clarify what is the correct behaviour.