Openbravo Issue Tracking System - Retail Modules
View Issue Details
0033516Retail ModulesOffline Modepublic2016-07-20 17:502017-10-19 09:55
lorenzofidalgo 
Retail 
normalminoralways
newopen 
5
main 
 
No
0033516: [RR16Q3] Nothing is shown in "Models to Synchronize" after user has tried to void a layaway in offline mode
It must be shown what is pending to synchronize if there is something pending. After voiding a layaway in offline mode, it is shown that there are something pending but, if POS user goes to "Models to Synchronize", no items are shown.
This issue is reproducible in RR16Q3, RR16Q2 & RR16Q1. Before that, it was not possible to void a layaway in offline mode.
0-Login POS as vallblanca.
1-In dropdown menu, go to Layaways and select any receipt that has been previously laid away.
2-Go offline.
3-In dropdown menu, click "Void this Layaway".
4-Tap in Total Amount button and select Card as Payment Method.
5-Complete the voiding of that layaway.
6-Go to "Models to Synchronize" (where pending items to synchronize are shown in POS). DEFECT: No items are shown.
No tags attached.
png NothingShownInModelsToSynchronize.png (123,965) 2016-07-20 17:50
https://issues.openbravo.com/file_download.php?file_id=9640&type=bug
png
Issue History
2016-07-20 17:50lorenzofidalgoNew Issue
2016-07-20 17:50lorenzofidalgoAssigned To => Retail
2016-07-20 17:50lorenzofidalgoFile Added: NothingShownInModelsToSynchronize.png
2016-07-20 17:50lorenzofidalgoTriggers an Emergency Pack => No
2016-07-20 17:52lorenzofidalgoDescription Updatedbug_revision_view_page.php?rev_id=12714#r12714
2016-07-20 17:52lorenzofidalgoDescription Updatedbug_revision_view_page.php?rev_id=12715#r12715
2016-11-03 15:00lorenzofidalgoNote Added: 0091079
2017-08-10 11:42lorenzofidalgoNote Added: 0098471
2017-10-19 09:55lorenzofidalgoNote Added: 0099952

Notes
(0091079)
lorenzofidalgo   
2016-11-03 15:00   
This issue is still reproducible in RR16Q4
(0098471)
lorenzofidalgo   
2017-08-10 11:42   
Issue still reproducible in RR17Q3
(0099952)
lorenzofidalgo   
2017-10-19 09:55   
This issue is still reproducible in RR17Q4