Openbravo Issue Tracking System - Openbravo ERP |
| View Issue Details |
|
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
| 0027742 | Openbravo ERP | 09. Financial management | public | 2014-10-02 13:09 | 2014-12-30 23:26 |
|
| Reporter | shuehner | |
| Assigned To | eduardo_Argal | |
| Priority | normal | Severity | major | Reproducibility | have not tried |
| Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | |
| Platform | | OS | 5 | OS Version | |
| Product Version | | |
| Target Version | 3.0PR15Q1 | Fixed in Version | | |
| Merge Request Status | |
| Review Assigned To | pramakrishnan |
| OBNetwork customer | |
| Web browser | |
| Modules | Core |
| Support ticket | |
| Regression level | |
| Regression date | |
| Regression introduced in release | |
| Regression introduced by commit | |
| Triggers an Emergency Pack | No |
|
| Summary | 0027742: The database view C_ORDER_LINETAX_VT is not used at all and has syntax concistency problem with pgsql 9.3 |
| Description | This view has same dbconsistency problems as described in issue 27741.
But also this c_order_linetax_vt view seems completely unused.
See following comments for more how that 'unused' was tested.
|
| Steps To Reproduce | - |
| Proposed Solution | Delete that view completely from the ERP as it seems not to be used at all.
NOTE: This will be an api-change |
| Additional Information | |
| Tags | No tags attached. |
| Relationships | | related to | defect | 0027741 | 3.0PR15Q1 | closed | eduardo_Argal | The database view APRM_REC_DETAIL_V has syntax inconsistency on PostgreSQL 9.3 (and 9.4beta) |
|
| Attached Files | |
|
| Issue History |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 2014-10-02 13:09 | shuehner | New Issue | |
| 2014-10-02 13:09 | shuehner | Assigned To | => dmiguelez |
| 2014-10-02 13:09 | shuehner | Modules | => Core |
| 2014-10-02 13:09 | shuehner | Triggers an Emergency Pack | => No |
| 2014-10-02 13:11 | shuehner | Target Version | => 3.0PR15Q1 |
| 2014-10-02 13:26 | shuehner | Note Added: 0070660 | |
| 2014-10-02 13:31 | shuehner | Relationship added | related to 0027741 |
| 2014-11-26 18:18 | shuehner | Assigned To | dmiguelez => eduardo_Argal |
| 2014-11-26 18:51 | eduardo_Argal | Status | new => scheduled |
| 2014-11-26 18:51 | eduardo_Argal | fix_in_branch | => pi |
| 2014-11-27 16:38 | hgbot | Checkin | |
| 2014-11-27 16:38 | hgbot | Note Added: 0072075 | |
| 2014-11-27 16:38 | hgbot | Status | scheduled => resolved |
| 2014-11-27 16:38 | hgbot | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2014-11-27 16:38 | hgbot | Fixed in SCM revision | => http://code.openbravo.com/erp/devel/pi/rev/e352011a1215d4e395ee469b99e7667fc1ad46c2 [^] |
| 2014-12-11 06:57 | pramakrishnan | Review Assigned To | => pramakrishnan |
| 2014-12-11 06:57 | pramakrishnan | Note Added: 0072412 | |
| 2014-12-11 06:57 | pramakrishnan | Status | resolved => closed |
| 2014-12-30 23:26 | hudsonbot | Checkin | |
| 2014-12-30 23:26 | hudsonbot | Note Added: 0073152 | |
|
Notes |
|
|
|
Testing done to find usage of this view:
1.) in a pi clone: grep -Iir C_ORDER_LINETAX_VT .
No occurrence found besides view definition itself.
Note: Not mapped at all in AD, so there cannot be any user via DAL.
2.) Search for view name in all gpscode hg-repos (130 repos) containing many modules by gps which are likely to not be in CR)
No occurrence found (ignoring pi branch which can be ignored)
3.) Grepping same way in most modules published in CR in status QAA.
Number of checked modules: 772, downloaded at 2014-08-04
No occurrence found.
Based on those checks i think we can fairly assume that it is very unlikely that the view is used by modules. |
|
|
|
(0072075)
|
|
hgbot
|
|
2014-11-27 16:38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|