Openbravo Issue Tracking System - Retail Modules
View Issue Details
0024382Retail ModulesWeb POSpublic2013-07-19 08:322015-05-13 16:46
sureshbabu 
migueldejuana 
lowtrivialalways
closedno change required 
30Professional Appliance
 
 
sureshbabu
No
0024382: [MULTI] Layaway & Not paid label wrongly appears in print copy. when an open receipt with zero amount is paid through multi orde
When payment is made through Multi order payment method, for a "open receipt" which is selected with Layaway option and the total gross amount is zero, in the print ticket "Layaway" label wrongly appears also, "Not Paid" label appears instead of Paid.
1) Create a Open receipt using products having 100% discount so that the total gross amount of the receipt is zero.

2) Then from Drop down menu, select "Layaway this order" option and verify Layaway label appear in the receipt

3) Then using "Pay open tickets" option select the above created receipt and complete the payment process

4) Then check print copy of the ticket, and one can see "Layaway" label wrongly appears as well as "Not Paid" label wrongly appears instead of "Paid" label.
No tags attached.
png Using Multi order payment , for a open receipt which is selected with Layaway option with zero gross amount, in the print ticket Layway label wrongly appears as well as Not Paid label appears instead of Paid..png (135,947) 2013-07-19 08:32
https://issues.openbravo.com/file_download.php?file_id=6276&type=bug
png
Issue History
2013-07-19 08:32sureshbabuNew Issue
2013-07-19 08:32sureshbabuAssigned To => migueldejuana
2013-07-19 08:32sureshbabuFile Added: Using Multi order payment , for a open receipt which is selected with Layaway option with zero gross amount, in the print ticket Layway label wrongly appears as well as Not Paid label appears instead of Paid..png
2015-05-13 16:46sureshbabuReview Assigned To => sureshbabu
2015-05-13 16:46sureshbabuNote Added: 0077395
2015-05-13 16:46sureshbabuStatusnew => closed
2015-05-13 16:46sureshbabuResolutionopen => no change required

Notes
(0077395)
sureshbabu   
2015-05-13 16:46   
No change required, the issue has been fixed