Openbravo Issue Tracking System - Openbravo ERP
View Issue Details
IDProjectCategoryView StatusDate SubmittedLast Update
0002304Openbravo ERPA. Platformpublic2007-11-26 08:522008-08-13 18:23
Reporteralostale 
Assigned Toalostale 
PrioritynormalSeverityminorReproducibilityalways
StatusclosedResolutionfixed 
PlatformOS5OS Version
Product Version 
Target VersionFixed in Version2.40alpha-r2 
Merge Request Status
Review Assigned To
OBNetwork customerNo
Web browser
ModulesCore
Support ticket
Regression level
Regression date
Regression introduced in release
Regression introduced by commit
Triggers an Emergency PackNo
Summary0002304: [Massive DB updates] Synchronize terminology
DescriptionSome processes make massive updates in DB dictionary tables, that are not
meaningful (i.e. updated time). This becomes a problem for svn commits,
because these xml files are always committed with a big number of minimal
changes.


Synchronize terminology is one of these processes. It updates the tables AD_Field, AD_Field_Trl, AD_Menu and AD_Menu_Trl setting the Updated field to the current time every time it is executed.
Steps To Reproduce
Proposed Solution
Additional Information
TagsNo tags attached.
Relationships
depends on backport 0003663 closed alostale [Massive DB updates] Synchronize terminology 
Attached Files
Issue History
Date ModifiedUsernameFieldChange
2008-08-13 18:23plujanStatusresolved => closed

Notes
(0005893)
user71   
2005-06-01 00:00   
(edited on: 2008-06-12 09:43)
This bug was originally reported in SourceForge bug tracker and then migrated to Mantis.

You can see the original bug report in:
https://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=1838516 [^]
(0002711)
alostale   
2007-11-26 18:08   
(edited on: 2008-06-12 09:23)
Logged In: YES
user_id=1500722
Originator: YES

This works properly, the problem is with the current data in sourcedata which is modified by this process due the values it has.
(0002712)
alostale   
2007-11-26 18:09   
(edited on: 2008-06-12 09:23)
Logged In: YES
user_id=1500722
Originator: YES

In addition there's a problem with ad_field update for PO case, it is not done properly.
(0002713)
alostale   
2007-11-27 09:50   
(edited on: 2008-06-12 09:23)
Logged In: YES
user_id=1500722
Originator: YES

Related to this bug (about the PO/SO synchronization): http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1839275&group_id=162271&atid=823129 [^]