Openbravo Issue Tracking System - Openbravo ERP
View Issue Details
0020458Openbravo ERPA. Platformpublic2012-05-09 17:062012-05-15 12:09
migueldejuana 
migueldejuana 
normalminoralways
closedno change required 
5
 
pi 
Core
No
0020458: In Pick and Execute Window, introducing wrong Ship Qty and selecting another row recalculate in wrong place.
In Pick and Execute Window of Return to Vendor Shipment, if we introduce a value higher than 10 in Ship Qty and then we select another record, it will put in Ship Qty of the new record, the difference between 10 and the wrong value of the Ship Qty of old record.
It is showed a pop-up but the focus is still back in the record.
See the screenshot to understand it better.
Go to Return to Vendor window.
Create a new one with Business Partner: Be Soft Drinker.
Click on Pick/Edit Lines. Remove all the filters.
Select one of the showed lines and enter a returned quantity, i.e:
The line with Product: Diet Soda Ship/Receipt Qty: 120 Returned:10
Book it.

Go to Return to Vendor Shipment Window.
Create a new one with Business Partner: Be Soft Drinker.
Click on Pick/Edit Lines.
Write 50 in Ship Qty and click on another record.
It will show a pop up meggase (Ship Qty exceeds the Pending Qty. Please enter a valid range: 0 - 10.).
(ERROR) While this pop up is showed, it changed the value of Ship Qty of the new record(New value: -40).
(ERROR) There is a pop up showed but the focus is still back in the selected record.
No tags attached.
png Captura de pantalla de 2012-05-09 16:36:50.png (173,168) 2012-05-09 17:06
https://issues.openbravo.com/file_download.php?file_id=5203&type=bug
png
Issue History
2012-05-09 17:06migueldejuanaNew Issue
2012-05-09 17:06migueldejuanaAssigned To => migueldejuana
2012-05-09 17:06migueldejuanaFile Added: Captura de pantalla de 2012-05-09 16:36:50.png
2012-05-09 17:06migueldejuanaModules => Core
2012-05-15 12:09migueldejuanaNote Added: 0048646
2012-05-15 12:09migueldejuanaStatusnew => closed
2012-05-15 12:09migueldejuanaResolutionopen => no change required
2012-05-15 12:09migueldejuanaFixed in Version => pi

Notes
(0048646)
migueldejuana   
2012-05-15 12:09   
The behaviour is correct.