Openbravo Issue Tracking System - Openbravo ERP
View Issue Details
IDProjectCategoryView StatusDate SubmittedLast Update
0015546Openbravo ERP02. Master data managementpublic2010-12-29 18:052012-01-31 18:46
ReporterRenateNieuwkoop 
Assigned Tomirurita 
PrioritynormalSeveritymajorReproducibilityalways
StatusscheduledResolutionopen 
PlatformOS5OS Version
Product Version3.0RC3 
Target VersionFixed in Version 
Merge Request Status
Review Assigned To
OBNetwork customer
Web browser
ModulesCore
Support ticket
Regression level
Regression date
Regression introduced in release
Regression introduced by commit
Triggers an Emergency PackNo
Summary0015546: 3.0RC3: ABC Code, used for Warehouse Management, is missing from the Product screen
DescriptionThe pareto report is part of warehouse management and assigns an ABC code to products. The ABC code is used for Physical Inventory also.

The ABC code was on the org specific tab, but that does not make any sense, since all fields on that tab are related to MRP setups.

So the proposal is, as discussed with Dmitry, to add the ABC code to the general tab of the product.
Steps To Reproduce
Proposed SolutionAs per Dmitry's mail:
I checked our description of business process and wall-to-wall count starts from ABC report so I would prefer not to change the basis (business process) on which we agreed on but to change the field placement.
Additional Information
TagsNo tags attached.
Relationships
related to defect 0019481 closed Sandrahuguet "Pareto Product Report" must be set as "Professional" feature same applies to "ABC Activity" 
Attached Files
Issue History
Date ModifiedUsernameFieldChange
2010-12-29 18:05RenateNieuwkoopNew Issue
2010-12-29 18:05RenateNieuwkoopAssigned To => adrianromero
2010-12-29 18:05RenateNieuwkoopModules => Core
2011-02-09 19:34psarobeTarget Version3.0RC4 => 3.0
2011-05-20 17:58psarobeNote Added: 0037292
2011-05-20 17:58psarobeStatusnew => scheduled
2011-05-20 17:58psarobeTarget Version3.0MP0 => 3.0MP3
2011-06-03 10:57dalsasuaAssigned Toadrianromero => dalsasua
2011-07-20 18:16dalsasuaAssigned Todalsasua => jonalegriaesarte
2011-08-23 10:47jonalegriaesarteAssigned Tojonalegriaesarte => psarobe
2011-08-31 11:36jonalegriaesarteNote Added: 0040605
2011-08-31 11:36jonalegriaesarteTarget Version3.0MP3 => 3.0MP4
2011-09-15 12:52dalsasuaAssigned Topsarobe => mirurita
2011-09-30 10:12jonalegriaesarteNote Added: 0041392
2011-09-30 10:12jonalegriaesarteTarget Version3.0MP4 => 3.0MP5
2011-10-29 16:30psarobeTypedefect => design defect
2011-10-31 11:56jonalegriaesarteNote Added: 0042397
2011-10-31 11:56jonalegriaesarteTarget Version3.0MP5 =>
2012-01-20 08:57RenateNieuwkoopNote Added: 0044455
2012-01-31 18:34dmitry_mezentsevRelationship addedrelated to 0019481
2012-01-31 18:46dmitry_mezentsevNote Added: 0044744
2015-05-14 15:07plujanRelationship addedhas duplicate 0014885

Notes
(0037292)
psarobe   
2011-05-20 17:58   
Needs to be refactored or find a better solution
(0040605)
jonalegriaesarte   
2011-08-31 11:36   
Due to the load with other issues we were not able to research this one for MP3, are planning MP4 for it now.
(0041392)
jonalegriaesarte   
2011-09-30 10:12   
Due to the load with other issues we were not able to research this one for MP4, are planning MP5 for it now.
(0042397)
jonalegriaesarte   
2011-10-31 11:56   
Removing target version because it is a design defect
(0044455)
RenateNieuwkoop   
2012-01-20 08:57   
This issue is related to issue 19481, please add relationship. If the Pareto is considered a professional feature, this field should also be displayed only upon activation of the instance.

thanks
Renate
(0044744)
dmitry_mezentsev   
2012-01-31 18:46   
Writing the documentation I clarified that ABC classification is indeed Org.Specific and one product for different organizations can have different classification. So moving this field to the Header is not a good idea as I thought before.

So the best solution would be to separate current Org.Specific Tab to 2 placing in one things that are related to Production and to another that are not.