Openbravo Issue Tracking System - Openbravo ERP
View Issue Details
IDProjectCategoryView StatusDate SubmittedLast Update
0012254Openbravo ERPZ. Otherspublic2010-02-12 20:022010-04-09 00:00
Reportershuehner 
Assigned Toshuehner 
PriorityimmediateSeveritycriticalReproducibilityhave not tried
StatusclosedResolutionfixed 
PlatformOS5OS Version
Product Versionpi 
Target VersionFixed in Version 
Merge Request Status
Review Assigned To
OBNetwork customerNo
Web browser
ModulesCore
Support ticket
Regression level
Regression date
Regression introduced in release
Regression introduced by commit
Triggers an Emergency PackNo
Summary0012254: API check build 290 fails - part2
Descriptionhttp://builds.openbravo.com/job/erp_devel_pi-module-integrity-test/290/console [^]


org.openbravo.model.ad.module:
Bad
method org.openbravo.model.ad.module.ModuleLog.getModule(): type org.openbravo.model.ad.module.Module in api-checks/java/reference/250, but type java.lang.String in /var/www/localhost/htdocs/japi/290
Missing
field org.openbravo.model.ad.module.Module.PROPERTY_MODULELOGLIST: missing in /var/www/localhost/htdocs/japi/290
method org.openbravo.model.ad.module.Module.getModuleLogList(): missing in /var/www/localhost/htdocs/japi/290
method org.openbravo.model.ad.module.Module.setModuleLogList(java.util.List<org.openbravo.model.ad.module.ModuleLog>): missing in /var/www/localhost/htdocs/japi/290
method org.openbravo.model.ad.module.ModuleLog.setModule(org.openbravo.model.ad.module.Module): missing in /var/www/localhost/htdocs/japi/290
Steps To Reproduce
Proposed Solution
Additional Information
TagsNo tags attached.
Relationships
related to defect 00117052.50MP12 closed marvintm AD_Module_Log table shouldn't have a reference to AD_Module table 
Attached Files
Issue History
Date ModifiedUsernameFieldChange
2010-02-12 20:02shuehnerNew Issue
2010-02-12 20:02shuehnerAssigned To => marvintm
2010-02-12 20:02shuehnerOBNetwork customer => No
2010-02-12 20:03shuehnerRelationship addedrelated to 0011705
2010-02-13 13:46iciordiaNote Added: 0024218
2010-02-13 13:46iciordiaAssigned Tomarvintm => pjuvara
2010-02-13 13:47iciordiaNote Added: 0024219
2010-02-13 13:47iciordiaAssigned Topjuvara => shuehner
2010-02-14 14:44hgbotCheckin
2010-02-14 14:44hgbotNote Added: 0024225
2010-02-14 14:44hgbotStatusnew => resolved
2010-02-14 14:44hgbotResolutionopen => fixed
2010-02-14 14:44hgbotFixed in SCM revision => http://code.openbravo.com/erp/devel/api-checks/rev/504160b62a1d7e9a24d92b8b00b9aca9af2c20a4 [^]
2010-02-14 15:24hgbotCheckin
2010-02-14 15:24hgbotNote Added: 0024226
2010-02-14 15:24hgbotFixed in SCM revisionhttp://code.openbravo.com/erp/devel/api-checks/rev/504160b62a1d7e9a24d92b8b00b9aca9af2c20a4 [^] => http://code.openbravo.com/erp/devel/api-checks/rev/74e638cc86ebc45c2132974bc7f79f72663e7e64 [^]
2010-04-08 11:30shuehnerNote Added: 0025969
2010-04-08 11:30shuehnerStatusresolved => closed
2010-04-09 00:00anonymoussf_bug_id0 => 2984164

Notes
(0024218)
iciordia   
2010-02-13 13:46   
Risk is very low since it is not likely at all someone has used this part of the API. And in any case the API was wrong -it makes no sense to enforce reference to an entity that can be deleted-.

Ismael
(0024219)
iciordia   
2010-02-13 13:47   
Accepted on Paolo's behalf.

Ismael
(0024225)
hgbot   
2010-02-14 14:44   
Repository: erp/devel/api-checks
Changeset: 504160b62a1d7e9a24d92b8b00b9aca9af2c20a4
Author: Stefan Hühner <stefan.huehner <at> openbravo.com>
Date: Sun Feb 14 14:44:57 2010 +0100
URL: http://code.openbravo.com/erp/devel/api-checks/rev/504160b62a1d7e9a24d92b8b00b9aca9af2c20a4 [^]

Fixed 12254: accept change

---
M model/sourcedata/AD_COLUMN.xml
---
(0024226)
hgbot   
2010-02-14 15:24   
Repository: erp/devel/api-checks
Changeset: 74e638cc86ebc45c2132974bc7f79f72663e7e64
Author: Stefan Hühner <stefan.huehner <at> openbravo.com>
Date: Sun Feb 14 15:24:35 2010 +0100
URL: http://code.openbravo.com/erp/devel/api-checks/rev/74e638cc86ebc45c2132974bc7f79f72663e7e64 [^]

Fixed 12254: accept change

---
M java/reference/250.japi.gz
---
(0025969)
shuehner   
2010-04-08 11:30   
api-check issue only, doesn't appear in check output anymore, closing.