Openbravo Issue Tracking System - Openbravo ERP |
View Issue Details |
|
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
0010473 | Openbravo ERP | 03. Procurement management | public | 2009-09-03 10:57 | 2010-04-19 21:11 |
|
Reporter | roklenardic | |
Assigned To | sivaraman | |
Priority | high | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | always |
Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | |
Platform | | OS | 5 | OS Version | |
Product Version | 2.50MP4 | |
Target Version | 2.50MP14 | Fixed in Version | | |
Merge Request Status | |
Review Assigned To | |
OBNetwork customer | No |
Web browser | |
Modules | Core |
Support ticket | |
Regression level | |
Regression date | |
Regression introduced in release | |
Regression introduced by commit | |
Triggers an Emergency Pack | No |
|
Summary | 0010473: Matched Purchase Order Filter |
Description | When clicking the filter icon in the Procurement Management || Transactions || Matched Purchase Order window, the field types from "Matched PO From" and "To" are amounts. Probably Dates were meant to be entered here. Regardless, the calculator of the first field does not work anyway and if you enter any values and click OK you get the following error:
:
ERROR: operator does not exist: character varying >= numeric
|
Steps To Reproduce | 1a) Go to Procurement Management || Transactions || Matched Purchase Orders
1b) Go to Procurement Management || Transactions || Matched Purchase Orders
2) Click on Search button |
Proposed Solution | The filters must be:
Product
Transaction date
Other filters are impossible |
Additional Information | |
Tags | No tags attached. |
Relationships | |
Attached Files | |
|
Issue History |
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
2009-09-03 10:57 | roklenardic | New Issue | |
2009-09-03 10:57 | roklenardic | Assigned To | => rafaroda |
2009-09-03 10:57 | roklenardic | OBNetwork customer | => No |
2009-09-14 13:31 | psarobe | Note Added: 0019905 | |
2009-09-14 13:31 | psarobe | Status | new => feedback |
2009-09-14 13:44 | roklenardic | Note Added: 0019907 | |
2009-09-18 13:47 | rafaroda | Note Added: 0020203 | |
2009-09-18 13:47 | rafaroda | Assigned To | rafaroda => psarobe |
2009-09-18 13:47 | rafaroda | Status | feedback => new |
2009-09-18 13:47 | rafaroda | Proposed Solution updated | |
2009-10-01 18:41 | psarobe | Note Added: 0020631 | |
2009-10-01 18:41 | psarobe | Priority | normal => high |
2009-10-01 18:41 | psarobe | Status | new => scheduled |
2009-10-01 18:41 | psarobe | Steps to Reproduce Updated | |
2009-10-01 18:56 | roklenardic | Note Added: 0020634 | |
2009-10-02 09:01 | psarobe | Note Added: 0020651 | |
2010-01-04 09:40 | psarobe | Assigned To | psarobe => rafaroda |
2010-01-04 09:40 | psarobe | Target Version | => 2.50MP13 |
2010-02-11 11:20 | rafaroda | Assigned To | rafaroda => adrianromero |
2010-03-08 16:06 | jpabloae | Target Version | 2.50MP13 => 2.50MP14 |
2010-03-29 06:56 | sivaraman | Assigned To | adrianromero => sivaraman |
2010-03-29 08:25 | hgbot | Checkin | |
2010-03-29 08:25 | hgbot | Note Added: 0025763 | |
2010-03-29 08:25 | hgbot | Status | scheduled => resolved |
2010-03-29 08:25 | hgbot | Resolution | open => fixed |
2010-03-29 08:25 | hgbot | Fixed in SCM revision | => http://code.openbravo.com/erp/devel/pi/rev/849d13feadc28b86b87009074d8ada5744d21d0f [^] |
2010-03-29 08:42 | sivaraman | Note Added: 0025764 | |
2010-03-30 07:15 | hgbot | Checkin | |
2010-03-30 07:15 | hgbot | Note Added: 0025796 | |
2010-03-30 07:15 | hgbot | Fixed in SCM revision | http://code.openbravo.com/erp/devel/pi/rev/849d13feadc28b86b87009074d8ada5744d21d0f [^] => http://code.openbravo.com/erp/devel/pi/rev/638a01be93f20ff58b115accd438e19e5f6651df [^] |
2010-04-01 07:06 | arunkumar | Note Added: 0025847 | |
2010-04-01 07:06 | arunkumar | Status | resolved => closed |
2010-04-02 00:00 | anonymous | sf_bug_id | 0 => 2980790 |
2010-04-19 21:11 | hudsonbot | Checkin | |
2010-04-19 21:11 | hudsonbot | Note Added: 0026396 | |
2010-04-19 21:11 | hudsonbot | Checkin | |
2010-04-19 21:11 | hudsonbot | Note Added: 0026397 | |
Notes |
|
|
Rok
This window should be deprecated. Why are you using it or which is the reason for using it?
Regards |
|
|
|
i am using it for 2 reasons:
1) because it's there which clearly should not be
2) because it gives an overview of all purchases and the ones who are not complete yet or are in partially complete. |
|
|
|
Here there are two problems with this filter:
1) Functionality: it does not make sense to have the ID column as the filter column. Another column has to be proposed for the filtering.
2) Platform: in case that someone enables the table column ID as search, this should not lead to a calculator anymore since it will not work with UUIDs. |
|
|
|
Hi Rok,
The filters must be:
Product
Transaction date
Other filters are impossible |
|
|
|
as you pointed out first, it should be deprecated right? |
|
|
|
Hi rok,
AS you pointed out :-) if it is useful for the people let's keep it and just change the filters |
|
|
(0025763)
|
hgbot
|
2010-03-29 08:25
|
|
|
|
|
The issue has been resolved. Hence, 'Filter window' will display the following fields.
1. Product
2. Transaction Date (From & To)
Steps to test:
1. Log on to Openbravo
2. Change role to Openbravo Admin
3. Go to Procurement Management || Transactions || Matched Purchase Orders
4. Click on Search button |
|
|
(0025796)
|
hgbot
|
2010-03-30 07:15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|