Openbravo Issue Tracking System - Openbravo ERP
View Issue Details
0010362Openbravo ERPA. Platformpublic2009-08-20 16:552009-08-25 00:00
shuehner 
shuehner 
immediateminorhave not tried
closedfixed 
5
pi 
 
Core
No
0010362: ad_message has entry with spelling error in value (search key)
ad_message.value has an entry with OPSCoummintyInstance

This should be changed to:

OPSCommunityInstance
change value and all callers.
OBPS-Security
Issue History
2009-08-20 16:55shuehnerNew Issue
2009-08-20 16:55shuehnerAssigned To => shuehner
2009-08-20 16:55shuehnerTag Attached: OBPS-Security
2009-08-20 17:51hgbotCheckin
2009-08-20 17:51hgbotNote Added: 0019133
2009-08-20 17:51hgbotStatusnew => resolved
2009-08-20 17:51hgbotResolutionopen => fixed
2009-08-20 17:51hgbotFixed in SCM revision => http://code.openbravo.com/erp/devel/pi/rev/7fdc3c192c637546fb47d13f027acdca16ed0978 [^]
2009-08-20 17:51shuehnerNote Added: 0019134
2009-08-24 16:42shuehnerNote Added: 0019197
2009-08-24 17:24plujanStatusresolved => closed
2009-08-24 17:24plujanNote Added: 0019201
2009-08-25 00:00anonymoussf_bug_id0 => 2843872

Notes
(0019133)
hgbot   
2009-08-20 17:51   
Repository: erp/devel/pi
Changeset: 7fdc3c192c637546fb47d13f027acdca16ed0978
Author: Stefan Hühner <stefan.huehner <at> openbravo.com>
Date: Thu Aug 20 17:50:53 2009 +0200
URL: http://code.openbravo.com/erp/devel/pi/rev/7fdc3c192c637546fb47d13f027acdca16ed0978 [^]

Fixed 10362: Fixed miss-spelled value in ad_message

---
M src-db/database/sourcedata/AD_MESSAGE.xml
M src/org/openbravo/erpCommon/ad_forms/InstanceManagement.java
---
(0019134)
shuehner   
2009-08-20 17:51   
@Qa: please that the following text is still correctly displayed in the instance activation page

Community Instance
 You can upgrade the license of your instance by contacting Openbravo sales staff.
(0019197)
shuehner   
2009-08-24 16:42   
With the current code this message is not displayed. As the part 'Instance Details' where it could appear is not shown in a community edition.
(0019201)
plujan   
2009-08-24 17:24   
Issue is not verified since it has no functional implications